| This study chooses textbooks from People’s Education Press and the Chinese Version forcomparison, whose main object is the comprehensive study of the junior middle school’slanguage learning. The reason to choose the two versions is because they are adopted by thelocal junior high schools as the language textbooks, thus the conclusion and the resultsobtained will be more meaningful to the junior high school language teaching in the region.By comparing two different versions of the Chinese textbooks, the thesis makes intensiveresearch on the concepts, layouts, contents and emphasis of the two in the comprehensivestudy of Chinese language. On the one hand it enables the majority of teachers to have adeeper insight into characteristics of the layouts of the textbooks and provides the majority offront-line teachers with workable teaching materials to improve their teaching. On the otherhand, it can provide the better materials to perfect the language textbooks and improve thequality of textbooks for the press houses, both of which contribute to the students’ Chinesestudy.In this study, comparative study and literature analysis are exploited, and the thesis isdivided into four parts. Firstly, the paper introduces the connotation and the significance ofChinese comprehensive learning. Secondly, it makes the common analysis of comprehensivestudy of two versions of textbooks. Thirdly, it compares the characteristics of the two versionsof the textbooks. Finally, it recommends and reflects on the comprehensive learning of thetwo versions of the textbooks. |