The Empirical Study Of The Comprehensive Evaluation Process Of Building The New Countryside In Shandong Province

The paper researches the theory problems about the concept, content, basic characteristics of the new socialist countryside, makes sure the objective necessity of building the new countryside and its relation to construction a moderately prosperous society and building a socialist harmonious society. Depending on the situation of Shandong Province, it combines the construction guidelines of building the new countryside and the goal of building the new socialist Shandong, and it uses the system theory and analysis method to analyze the main elements, system structure of the new countryside and the main factors that impact the construction of the new socialist countryside. The paper establishes the index system and evaluation model of the new socialist countryside construction, adopted AHP, spatial statistical analysis (LISA index) and other modern new method to establish a set of method system to monitor and evaluate the construction process of the new countryside. After analyzing the main elements, system structure and all factors impacting the building of the new socialist countryside, the paper proposed the environmental factors, say external factors include3fields:the "Rural infrastructure," the "Development of the rural public welfare" and the "Integrate and coordinate development" of the city and countryside; the basic elements, say the internal elements include5fields:the "Production development," the "Affluent life," the "Rural civilization," the "Neat appearance," and the "Democratic management"; the effect element is the "Peasant happiness level". It divided into9fields and selected28indicators totally and took the data of2011as the sample, applied the combining methods of quantitative and qualitative analysis and the conducted the empirical study of quantitative analysis and synthesis evaluation about the new countryside construction in Shandong Province, at the same time, dynamically compared this results with the data of2007.Then it comes to the conclusion that the current construction of the new countryside in Shandong Province ahs achieved initial success and the building is orderly conducting. At the same time as the different geographical conditions, development philosophy and other factors, the construction has shown the development situation of significant differences in three different levels. In the current development problems and deficiencies, the most prominent issues are the unbalanced regional development in the east and west and the large regional differences. Such as the investment of the rural ingrastructure of the east region is larger, and it’s able to offer strong financial support for the new rural building, but for the lack of the hematopietic function of the central and western government, they can’t provide more financial support. The coordinate and integrate development in the east part between city and countryside is good. There’s almost no significant difference between them. Because the long rigid thinking of the central and western regions they can’t achieve the coordinated development of agriculture and other industries, and they can’t compare with the development cities in the eastern region. When it’s specific to each filed, the gap between western and eastern cities and the gap within these cities are extremely different.Finally aiming at the existing problems and deficiencies in current construction of the new countryside, the paper standing at the system and strategic perspective to propose the basic ideas, promote strategies and concrete measures to speed up the development of the new countryside construction in Shandong Province directing at different development situation of the three regions:we should take various measures to enhance the overall efficiency of agriculture and the competitiveness of agricultural products; perform the strategy of "urban and rural development", focus on the development of county economy; accelerate the transfer of surplus rural labor force adjustment, and actively develop non-agricultural industries; increase investment in rural infrastructureimprove rural production and living standards; firmly push forward the process of urbanization in rural areas, accelerate rural development; resolutely implement preferential agricultural policies to curb the gap between urban and rural areas; strengthen the development of rural culture, education, science and technology, health services, and effectively improve the quality of farmers.