Chinese Five Major Poverty Alleviation Effect Evaluation And Countermeasures Research Since Eleven-five Plan

Since reform and opening up, Chinese focus on poverty alleviation anddevelopment work, poverty alleviation has achieved remarkable results. See results atthe same time, also should be aware that China’s poverty alleviation work is a difficulttask and a long history. Working in the poverty alleviation and development faces manynew problems during the advance, such as the slowing trend in the pace of povertyreduction in rural areas in China, in part, exists on the rural poor more help the more,and so on. In practice, this involves key questions is how to evaluate the effect on thereduction of poverty. In this regard, investigations in the field and learn from and absorbthis article on the basis of previous research, the typical backward Jiangxi province asan example, on poverty alleviation in Chinese five largest mode system evaluationissues in depth. In order to provide objective, scientific evaluation of effect of providinga reference and reference for Jiangxi as well as the other parts of the country for furtherexploration of ways and means to improve the effectiveness of poverty alleviationprovides the appropriate basis and the reference value.First, describing the background and significance of the study; Definition of theconcept of poverty, rural poverty, summarized the theory associated with povertyalleviation model, analyzed the present situation of poverty. Research content for thechapters that follow in this section provides a scientific theory.Second, since "Eleven-Five" pro-poor development work in the most with typicalof industrialization pro-poor mode, and whole village advance pro-poor mode andtechnology pro-poor-"rain plans" mode for cases respectively for special evaluationindicators design, and immigrants relocation pro-poor mode and social pro-poor modeof implementation situation and made of effectiveness be analysis, to specific in-depthgrasp pro-poor work by produces of effect, needs using must method on pro-poor effect for evaluation. Evaluation results, first determine the choice of evaluation indicators andpoverty alleviation model of analysis has an important role. Poverty monitoring unitcurrently common practice is the use of a set of indicators for monitoring and evaluation,and does not take into account the diversity of poverty alleviation. Different models forpoverty alleviation goals oriented to different, if we apply the same monitoring andevaluation index system, cannot fully and accurately reflect the practical effects of thedifferent models for poverty alleviation. In view of this, ad hoc evaluation indicatorsused in this paper to evaluate the different models for poverty alleviation, also fully takeinto account the characteristics of poverty patterns vary, in turn oriented povertyreduction model in evaluation of the effect of a more in-depth objective analysis,policies of their respective regulatory agencies to provide more accurate and objectivebasis.Third, according to the design of evaluation index in Jiangxi province as anexample of the effect of five typical models for poverty alleviation in China wereevaluated analysis. Through evaluation and analysis came to the following conclusion:(1)2004-2009, Jiangxi provincial poverty alleviation effect on overall are on the rise.Also note that during this period, the contribution to the economic dimension is on therise, but the overall effect, dimensions of the contribution to the economy has been low,with the expected gap, on pro-poor investments in infrastructure leading to economicdevelopment effects need to be further excavated, and is located in environment-relatedin underdeveloped areas in Jiangxi province. Economic development as a whole lessdeveloped, to a certain extent affect the effectiveness of pro-poor investments ininfrastructure leading to economic development.(2) the application of specific indicatorsin five modes which found effect evaluation of three typical models for povertyalleviation, the use of specific indicators for evaluation of different models for povertyalleviation effect than applying the same set of indicators for evaluation to be morereasonable and more in line with actual. Results further illustrate poverty alleviationmodel itself does not exist which is better, just a matter of adaptation in an area not used,must defend all States have different degrees of poverty alleviation of science, alsoprovided follow-up suggestions put forward new ideas.Finally, based on earlier research, targeting of Jiangxi province and other parts ofthe country, made available for reference and reference for rural poverty reductionincreases with suggestions to improve. Including: change no matter what povertyreduction mode, generally apply the same evaluation system of practice, rural povertyalleviation effect of establishing ad hoc evaluation system and evaluation system; Suit measures to local conditions to select model for poverty alleviation; Different modelsfor poverty alleviation, optimized for rural poverty reduction path options; Many ways,such as improving the efficient use of funds.