Guangxi Sciene And Technology Of Public Participation In Decision-Making Effectiveness Research

The traditional areas of science and technology policy-making has been ruled by an expert, The public which is considered unable to understand the complexity of science and technology have been excluded from participation in the policy process, but with the development of the times, the effect of technology decisions has penetrated into every aspect of public life, and even some of them have decided the exist of relevant public’s right, public participation in decision-making has become a main trend of democratization and scientific administration and also become a hot and difficult problem.Academia have made various studies in the public participation in sci ence and technology policy-making, but previous studies is about to theor etical level,the main concepts related to the public participation in scienc e and technology policy-making, the theoretical basis, the need for public participation, the motivation of participation, and other aspects of public participation forms, the research on practical level is less. Even some sch olars have conducted a study on the effectiveness, it is simply from the breadth, scope of participation to study, the depth and validity problems r arely involved in. This paper argues that the number of participants and t he scope of public participation is only a part of breadth, and effectivenes s of public participation should contain not only the breadth of participati on, but also should include the depth and the validity of participation. Th erefore, this paper is on the base of the concept of science and technolog y policy-making, forms of participation, the theory of participation and the motivation analysis, focus on the study of the effectiveness of public parti cipation in science and technology policy-making, analysis the effectivenes s from three aspects, build a validity evaluation system of the public par ticipation in science and technology policy-making, divide the breadth of participation into the degree of participation, participation channels, the s cope of participation, divide the depth of participation into the scope of P articipate and the degree of autonomy, divide the validity of Participation into The individual and whole effect. And selected Guangxi ethnic minorit y areas for the study, take participation in deliberative democracy theory and the ladder of public participation in science and technology policy-ma king as the theoretical perspective. on the basis of the analysis of the que stions above, through the combining research, proposed effectiveness mea sures to increase the effectiveness of participation.The main point of this article is:Guangxi public has through public notice, hearings, petitions, lawsuits and other systems involved in the science and technology policy-making, and has played a certain role, but the effectiveness of their participation still have the problem in breadth, depth and validity.From the breadth of participation, the problem is that the level of participation is low, participation channels lack of diversification, the scope of participation is small; from the depth of participation, the problem is the small-scale participatory role, low participation level of autonomy; the problem of the validity of participation is the absence of individual effects and overall effects. The main reason of the problem are:the system of public participation is not perfect; the impediment of traditional decision-making models; shackles of traditional cultural patterns; restrictions of Technology development and education level; obstacles of low level of economic development; lack of the public, experts and decision-makers three interaction mechanisms. response to these problems and cause analysis, solutions to this problem are:to accelerate political reform and promote the realization of democracy; to establish a scientific system to protect the system of public participation; changing public awareness of participation, increase public participation; offer diverse participation channels, reduce the cost of public participation; improve the information disclosure mechanism, to expand the scope of public participation in science and technology policy-making; to implement "multi-center" network-based governance, expanding the scope of the role of public participation; to develop two-way communication and feedback model to improve public autonomy; to enhance individual Game capability of public participation; to strengthen the level of organization of public participation.