The Theory Of The Basic People’s Court Judges Judicial Ethics Construction

As the people’s court case quantity "blowout" growth, social contradictions to resolve more and more demands the judges have the good professional ethics. On the judge’s professional quality increasingly attention today, the judge’s judicial ethics level has increasingly become an important index to measure the overall quality of the judges.In judicial practice, the grass-roots people’s courts are generally far from the city, working conditions are generally more hard than business courts, less judges, but bearing a lot of case work. The grass-roots court judges generally have traditional types of case trial and the types of cases are mainly concentrated in the divorce, the contract of sale, the motor vehicle traffic accident, private lending, financial borrowing cases and so on. The court is located in the local community, the characteristics of judicial behavior of grass-roots court judges in specific disputes must embody authority requirements, embodying the judicial activism. Judicial activism requires more active as a judge, but lack of grass-roots courts in judicial practice judges occupation sense of honor, affects the enthusiasm of grass-roots court judges’work, leading to the judicial ethics in the absence of grass-roots courts, specifically in the subjective and objective in the work of the lack. In the subjective understanding of grass-roots court judges, often because of their own lack of occupation and implementation, the occupation in the concept of consciousness of the treasure is not enough, in many cases to ignore the integrity requirements, reaching out the hands to the cases, in order to solve the problem of cost overruns the grass-roots courts often appear. In the absence of objective work mainly engaged in non single responsibility fulfillment situation often ignores the judicial ethics construction in the grass-roots courts.Compared with the business courts, the grass-roots courts have its unique characteristics, special effects and window functions of the grass-roots courts, having its unique value of existence, and the grass courts are the forefront o frontier fortress and publicity of law to resolve disputes. But it has also led to the grass-roots court judges in the course of their duties to "invisible corruption", this kind of problems, investigate its reason, mainly lies in the grass-roots court judge having less sense of honor and the lack of supervision, so in the judicial practice it is necessary through good judicial ethics construction, to eliminate grass-roots court judges’slack mood.Practical way to cultivate grass-roots court judge judicial ethics:first of all, to establish the legal belief of grass--roots court judge, embarking from the reality, to establish the proper legal belief extremely urgent, but also very difficult, it needs through the judicial ethics development to promote grass-roots court judges the early establishment of legal belief. Secondly, cultivate grass-roots court judge good professional ethics, in reality grass-roots court judges lack of the belief professional ethics, the professional ethics practice is extremely urgent, and it needs to pass the judicial ethics construction to establish grass-roots court judges occupation moral belief. Again, through the strengthening and improvement of grass-roots courts and judges the survival status of the supervision measures of grass-roots court judges to provide a good external environment for the judicial ethics of the grass-roots court judges. Finally, the idea of judicial ethics of judges to achieve path through the grass-roots courts trial management, putting forward the implementation of grass-roots courts, to promote the "flexible management", together with rigid management, promote grass-roots court judges independent judicial power to exercise. Ensure that the grass court judge law and, through its honesty and justice behavior in response to the public for the question of justice, gradually to dilute the concept exists in reality people the privilege consciousness, to solve the mechanism function of the multivariate dispute, ensuring judicial justice initiative for intervention in the formation of the concept of social justice needs, to help the majority of the masses of the people, forcing grass-roots court judges to strengthen the judicial ethics itself, so as to ensure that the judicial behavior made by grass-roots court judges in accordance with the requirements of the judicial justice and judicial integrity.