Beijing Sport University Volleyball Student Screening Analysis Function Is Activated

Volleyball is a clear division of labor collective position of sports, athletes are very different in different volleyball court specific division of labor and skills, tactical tasks. Sports injuries not only cause physical in certain influence on the athletes, but the athletes also cause some psychological trauma.Function operates Screening (FMS) is a forecasting system. It is a seven-step reliable observation system, is designed to participate in sports crowd on the basic operation mode normal sort. By observing the operation mode can be limitations on the action and the action is not proportioned to confirm, grading and sorting.In this paper, quantitative analysis of functional movement screening to understand the functional characteristics of volleyball players, volleyball on the Beijing Sports University students and Bayi special screening study of volleyball players, and then through the literature, measurement, mathematical statistics, comparative analysis method The data were analyzed and the final conclusion:The number of participants in this study a total of 93 people, including 61 boys,32 girls who come through the data analysis functions to be tested by screening scores overall action can be, but still has some damage exists, step over the hurdle the lower scores.With subjects getting older, the test scoring did not change significantly, also shows that age and functional movement screening score is no relationship. On the BMI index, FMS scores stabilized, underweight or overweight functional movement screening score is not much correlation. With the improvement of vertical jump achievement, being tested by the test results did not increase as the vertical jump score 2.7m above the functional action be tested screening score stabilized. The lower the moving speed of the subjects, the more time-consuming test subject, the scoring function movement screening.Studies on differences in gender and functional movement screening of students, only the trunk and shoulder stability operation flexibility screening action P values less than 0.05, there are significant differences, and the remaining five are no significant movement screening differences. Different training time and location on the field with seven different functional movement screening scores are not significantly different.