Comparative Study Of Talent Cultivating Program For Sports Specialty (Undergraduate) Between Soochow University And University Of Taipei

Professional training program is college sports professional sports personnel training process and the main basis for important foundation. By comparing with Soochow University Sports(undergraduate) Training Program University of Taipei, to explore their similarities and differences in sports(undergraduate) training program and their development trends and characteristics, through a comparative study for their training program proposed rationalization of the comments and suggestions, to find differences in the comparison, and development in learning, drawing on the sublimation seek.In this paper, the literature, logical analysis, comparative method, data analysis,University of Suzhou four undergraduate professional sports training program and University of Taipei in four of the seven undergraduate professional training programs were compared and analysis,Concluded as follow:1. University of Taipei in sports than the Soochow University(undergraduate)professional setting broader, more professional, and a combination of regional, set up a professional with regional specialties and there is a market demand. Soochow University on specialty mainly based on "University undergraduate catalog(1998)," there is no close connection with the current settings in the professional needs of the community, professional name is too fine, so that personnel employment options subject to certain restrictions.2. The terms of training objectives, training objectives Soochow University generalizations too, mostly with the "compound", "applied" and other words summed up,is not clear enough and clear. Aspect University of Taipei training objectives seteducational goals and core competencies of two modules, set forth in the text simple and clear, but not unified in different professions forth, not strict enough.3. general education curriculum section, Soochow University Physical Education(Undergraduate) Course content unreasonable, ’Morality courses and foreign language courses Public Credit proportion is too heavy, too many courses, arts and humanities,natural sciences and other course content areas set too low, too low credit requirements,no real employment needs for the training of personnel, and general education and training of generalist who complete educational goals do not match.4. professional basic curriculum, Soochow University, is more comprehensive and reasonable, accurately reflect the effect of the major categories of basic courses in the student talent cultivation, and set different categories of courses. The University of Taipei basic curriculum in this specialty too simple, and only a limited category of exercise physiology class, single content does not reflect the effect of the major categories of foundation courses.5. Curriculum section, University of Taipei Physical Education undergraduate professional courses Total credits than Suzhou college sports professional Curriculum total credits. The main difference is the number of credits in elective courses Course,University of Taipei than Soochow University.6. Taipei Physical Education college students group is not set in the professional part of elective courses, different employment direction for students to choose. But in the school group setting, there are too many different professional coincide in direction of employment. Soochow University as part of defining a set of professional training direction, so the proportion of credits and the number of elective courses in the professional part of the curriculum are less. Also in special majoring in technical subjects, far longer than Soochow University Sports(undergraduate) at the Taipei Physical Education University(undergraduate) study, and in a wider number of professional technical subjects elective part and open range.