Evaluation On The Scheme Of Increasing Efficiency Of #5 #6 Unit In Hebei Xibaipo No.2 Power Generation Co.,Ltd

The power industry is an important foundation of the national economy.The rising of the national economy puts forward higher demands on the generating units of the power generation companies.In order to improve the efficiency of power generation and ensure the core competitiveness of the power enterprises,Necessary,and the evaluation of the transformation program can be better to play a role,compare the best or most in line with the requirements of the program.This paper mainly evaluates the three transformation schemes of the project of adding and increasing the capacity of 5 6th unit of Hebei West Second Company.Based on the relevant literatures on the comprehensive evaluation of the unit at home and abroad,the research background and significance of the project evaluation are analyzed,and then the general situation related to the project and the theoretical method of evaluation are introduced.The research ideas and application The comprehensive evaluation method,and put forward the transformation plan.Finally,the combination of analytic hierarchy process and fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method is used to evaluate the efficiency improvement project of Unit 5 and 6 of Hebei West Second Company,and the conclusion is drawn.On the basis of proposing three kinds of transformation schemes,this paper establishes the index system and the comprehensive evaluation model of comprehensive evaluation of unit efficiency and capacity enhancement.The technical indicators,financial indicators,environmental indicators and social indicators as a primary indicator,under the primary indicators and then select the secondary indicators,through the analytic hierarchy process to establish the weight of the index,the evaluation of the weight of the indicators were sorted to determine the right The weight of the overall goal.Fuzzy evaluation was carried out by fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method,and the evaluation results were analyzed.From the final calculation results,that is,without considering the program one(financial evaluation is not feasible)conditions,we can see the overall program three in the economic benefits of inferior to the overall program II,after a comprehensive evaluation analysis,the overall program two The final score of 93.531 higher than the overall program of the final score of 93.385,we can see that the choice of two relatively reasonable and more efficient.