The Influence Of Attachment Type And Staying Left Or Not On The Aggressiveness Of Junior Middle School Students Under The Stressful Situation

This study was designed to investigate the situation under the influence of pressure attachment styles and experience of junior middle school students stay aggressive.The research one uses ?Experiences in Close Relationships???Adolescent Self-Rating Life Events Check List?and?Aggression Questionnaire? to investigate junior middle school students daily stress,attachment relationship,staying experience with the offensive relationship.The research two uses 2 × 2 × 2 mixed experimental design: the independent variable is stressful situation(exist,not exist)× attachment type(safe,unsafe)×stay behind experience(have,have not),The stressful situations were designed within subjects,attachment and stay behind experience as inter-test design,and dependent variables were implicit and explicit aggressiveness.The experiment uses the Tristan Social Stess Test(TSST)as the situation,using Eprime2.0 software to formulate implicit association test program(IAT)to test implicit aggressiveness,and a variety of emotional adjective checklist MAACL hostile scale MAACL-H test Explicit aggressiveness.By analyzing the relationship between attachment,stay behind experience,the factors of daily stress and aggression found: there are significant differences stay experience and non-experience is left behind on the presence of physical aggression(F=5.714,p=0.017),anger(F=12.16,p=0.001),hostility(F=13.18,p=0.000)and aggression scores(F=14.43,p=0.000);Aggressive factors and attachment factors have different degrees of correlation and in general are positive correlations(p<0.01);And there are different degrees of positive correlation between offensive factors and daily stress(p<0.01).Taking stay left experience,daily stress and attachment type as independent variables,score of aggressiveness scale as dependent variable for multiple stepwise regression analysis found leftbehind experience,daily stress,and attachment relationships can explain the 50.7% change in aggressiveness,(R2=0.507).The aggressive regression coefficient of staying experience(t=-13.307,p=0.000),attachment relationship(t=7.506,p=0.000),daily stress(t=2.936,p=0.004)are significant.The implicit aggression results of different attachment types in stress situations,left-behind and non-left-behind junior middle school students illustrate the main effects of stress situation(F=100.258,p=0.000),attachment type(F=4.484,p=0.036),and left behind experience(F=6.615,p=0.011)are significant,the interaction of stressful situations and attachment types on implicit aggressiveness(F=5.001,p=0.027).Next using simple effect analysis showed that two attachment types of subjects,the impact of stressful situations on implicit aggression is significant(F=5.48,p=0.021)(F=21.42,p=0.000).Implicit aggressiveness in stressful situations is higher than implicit aggressiveness in stressless situations;The subjects no matter in stressful situation or not,attachment types have a significant impact on implicit aggression(F=4.6,p=0.022)(F=35.48,p=0.000),the implicit attack of safe attachment subjects was lower than that of unsafe subjects.The explicit aggression results of different attachment types in stress situations,leftbehind and non-left-behind junior middle school students illustrate the main effects of stress situation(F=87.134,p=0.000),attachment type(F=15.395,p=0.000),and left behind experience(F=43.641,p=0.000)are significant,the interaction of stressful situations,attachment types and left behind experience on explicit aggressiveness(F=4.832,p=0.03).Next using simple and simple effect analysis showed that left-behind junior middle school students in stress-free situations,different attachment types on the explicit offensive impact is not significant(F=1227.13,p>0.05);non-left-behind junior middle school students have significant influence on external aggression in the absence of stress(F=84.2,p=0.001);In stressful situations,regardless of whether they stayed or not,the effect of attachment type on explicit aggression was significant(F=61.76,p=0.004)(F=45.03,p=0.015);In the stress-free scenario,the type of secure attachment test did not significantly influence the outward aggression of staying or not(F=22.38,p>0.05);In unsafe situations,unsafe subjects left significant impact on explicit aggressiveness in stress-free situations(F=166.00,p=0.000);Safe and unsafe participants in the stress situation,stay or not on the explicit offensive impact were significant(F=149.55,p=0.000)(F=133.79,p=0.000).The relationship between implicit aggression and explicit aggression analyzed by establishing model results reflected the dual model of implicit attack and explicit attack has better fitting degree,?2/df=0.119,GFI=0.999,TLI=1.073, CFI=1.000,RMSEA=0.000,and proved implicit aggression and explicit aggression as two different psychological structures,independent of each other.Analysis conclusion:(1)Left-behind experience,attachment relationship,daily stress,three independent variables and offensive variables,exist a significant linear correlation and prove the follow-up of two experiments with research value.(2)Junior middle school students show more implicit aggression in stressful situations than in stressless situations;Junior middle school students with safe attachment type are less aggressive than unsafe middle school students;The implicit aggressiveness of left-behind junior middle school students is significantly higher than that of non-left-behind junior middle school students.Regardless of stressful situations,the safety of attachment-based junior middle school students is higher than the implicit aggression offended junior middle school students;In the face of stress situations,subjects with both attachment types had higher implicit aggressiveness than implicit aggressiveness without stressful situations.(3)Junior middle school students show more aggressive aggression than nonstressful situations in stressful situations;Junior middle school students with unsafe attachment showed a higher apparent attack type than junior middle school students with safe attachment;The apparent aggressiveness of left-behind junior middle school students is higher than that of non-left-behind junior middle school students;Non-left-behind junior middle school students in stress-free situations,the style of attachment significantly impact on the offensive;In junior middle school students who stay or not in stressful situations,the effect of attachment type on explicit aggression is significant;In the stress-free situation,there was no significant impact on the external aggression in the secure attachment style test;In unsafe situations,unsafe subjects left significant impact on explicit aggressiveness in stress-free situations;In the stress situation,the safety and unsafe subjects were significantly affected by external attacks.(4)Explicit and implicit attacks are independent of each other.