The Judge Handling Quality Lifelong Responsibility System Research

Handling quality lifelong responsibility system proposed not only caused widespread concern theorists, practitioners and the masses, and the judicial practice has brought a major impact, especially on the front line of the trial judge significance.I support the implementation of the judge "wrong case" accountability, it is believed that the premise and basis of accountability must be clear "misjudged cases" standard. Current judicial reform is in full swing, and the quality of handling lifelong responsible for the production of important content and major initiatives under the new round of judicial reform in the context Judges accountability reform, in order to flourish from putting down roots must be done explicitly connotation, detailed standards, applied science policy, internally and externally. Otherwise, not only will not help in the reform of the judiciary, but also adversely affect the long-term stability and development team of judges of the trial career. I believe that is an essential attribute of judicial discretion in this paper to determine the jurisdiction for property rights perspective to judge the quality of handling lifelong responsibility system has been discussed several plain.The thesis is divided into four parts, the first part describes the quality of the judge handling the case of lifelong responsibility at home and abroad and raised the status quo; the second part from the fact that the impact of the uncertainty of judgment, the rules of evidence for the judge, not the cognitive statute deterministic perspective of the three trial judges the right to property, and to put forward as a basis for a standard and judge the case may be misjudged exemption; the third part from both positive and negative dimensions describes the effect of lifelong responsibility system; the fourth part the author proposes to implement a scientific and rational handling quality lifelong responsibility of judges need to "Out":internal trial is to establish the scientific power operating mechanism within the Court, and "let the referee trier", to establish a scientific accountability mechanisms, and "by the referee responsible." To the outside court case quality lifelong responsibility system implementation and operation of the objective conditions and to create a good external environment.