Study Of Administrative Enforcement Of Urban Management In Prefecture-level Cities

As a crucial part of city governance,administrative enforcement of urban management significantly influences city development.During transition period of economic society and crucial stage of reformation,social confliction takes place frequently;therefore,efficient administrative enforcement of urban management is essential for guaranteeing acceleration of domestic urbanization in the field of enforcement.Administrative enforcement of urban management relies on relatively centralized administrative punishment that is initially to solve problems like duplicate law enforcement,overlapped function and duplicate penalty in administrative enforcement of urban management.However,due to lack of unified law regulations,there is no consolidated system or mode for the administrative enforcement.In particular,with acceleration of legalization in China,people become more aware of administrative and legal rights.Furthermore,public opinions disseminate fast with new media like network,so that many problems referring to the system of administrative enforcement are exposed and must be resolved soon.Nevertheless,as an important project,the system and mode reformation of administrative enforcement are nowhere near being intensively studied in enforcement practice and theoretical research,or in legislation,which is the reason why this article puts emphasis on administrative enforcement of urban management.Taking administrative enforcement practice in Taiyuan City as a research object,this article attempts to study and discuss the issues concerning administrative enforcement of urban management in prefectural-Level cities.This thesis can be divided into three parts as following.Part one elaborates briefly the development of administrative enforcement of urban management in our country.As basic theoretical discussion for the whole study,this part identifies and analyzes relevant concepts of administrative enforcement of urban management.Advantages and disadvantages of the three modes of administrative enforcement—city management,district management,as well as city-district joint management—are elaborated in this part.This part also clarifies the development of domestic city administrative enforcement,lists origins of laws referring to the domestic city administrative enforcement,induces department settings of the domestic city administrative enforcement,and states the urgent necessity for strengthening the domestic city administrative enforcement.Part two analyzes current situation,problems and causes of administrative enforcement of urban management in Taiyuan City.With reference to the author’s job position and nature,this part makes a comprehensive elaboration and analysis on the situation of administrative enforcement of urban management in Taiyuan.The administrative enforcement in Taiyuan is conducted by the mode of city-district joint management,which has advantages and is successful to some extent,enforcement conflicts exist,though.Problems exist mainly in enforcement team building and enforcement concepts.Some of these problems are regional,but most of them are common problems in the field of China’s administrative enforcement of urban management.Therefore,this thesis tries to elaborate the regional problems and the causes of administrative enforcement in Taiyuan,and discusses the common problems and the causes in the field of China’s administrative enforcement of urban management as well.Part three focuses on countermeasures and suggestions to improve administrative enforcement of urban management in prefectural-Level cities.The author discusses system construction,capacity building,and environment construction related to enforcement environment of urban management in Taiyuan,and makes some proposals to improve the administrative enforcement of urban management in prefectural-Level cities,in the hope of contributing to the regional and nationwide legislation and enforcement of urban management.