The Local Autonomy Controlled Under The Central Government

Review the history,it is not difficult to find,now the relationship between the central and local governments is still not out of a closed die,put random "cycle.Since eighteen,the increasing emphasis on decentralization,more and more attention to the autonomy of local government.But this reform is still far from complete,therefore,the relationship between central and local governments clearly remains the concern of the community.During this period,the theory and the research on it is very important.The purpose of this study is to analyze the development status of L in the past thirty years the iron and steel industry,the local government in different period on the implementation of small steel policy as the starting point,from the perspective of institutional analysis,discuss the pros and cons of central control and local autonomy and summarizes the relationship between central and local governments in order to.Substantial deficiencies in the field of the theory of enlightenment to administrative reality.It is not much study on the interests of central control and local autonomy behind the literature in the social transformation China perplexing state,and this kind of transformation is far from over,with the interests of the central and local government relationship is explained not enough.Through literature analysis and interviews,found that since the reform and opening,the system of central control and local autonomy behind enough,leading to the local government in the process of the implementation of specific policies in the There is not a unified context to follow this line is the system.This paper use content analysis method in L system,the local government in the different stages of the implementation of the policy of small iron and steel as an example,explain the relationship between central and local government: in the end is the central control theory or local autonomy is more reasonable,or both are biased.That of Central control and local autonomy,all there is not sufficient institutional situation.On the one hand,the central and local control of the target may be because it is difficult to form compatible interests may not be fully achieved;on the other hand,local autonomy is very limited,because the central government will own will force the place to perform,even in violation of their interests should obey the central place it is the policy of the central government.The non institutional structure of local execution behavior impact.Only the widely accepted social rules can be incorporated into the system,so in thecentral the formulation of policy,must make sure the policy system of clear,in order to avoid the non institutional structure of the policy impact on the local implementation,so that the central and local relations can get and long-term stable development.This paper is divided into five chapters.The first chapter is the introduction,mainly introduces the research background,reviews the research status of the central control and local autonomy,in a clear academic dispute on the basis of the methods of research on the relationship between the central and local autonomous control of the decision;the second chapter is the related concept;third the chapter reviews the small steel policy since the reform and opening up in various stages of the introduction of the central and non institutionalized central policy in different periods;the fourth chapter L implementation policy of this case described the local small iron and steel in different periods is how to respond to the policy of the central government to the local government.Based on the specific situation of the implementation of reform and opening up policy the analysis,judgment,attempts to further clarify the academic controversies and contradictions for central and local autonomous control theory on the current situation in theory,the view of this paper Point: in the system between central and local government is not sufficient,on the one hand,the central control of the target may not be fully achieved,because it is difficult to form a compatible with local interests;on the other hand,local autonomy is very limited,because the central government will own will force them to accept,even in violation of their interests where should obey the central government;the fifth chapter is the conclusion and further discussion.The conclusion of this paper is non institutionalized" structure to affect the execution behavior of the local,and the central control and local autonomy on the two existing literature are discussed.