| Tourism resources are the prerequisite for development of tourism, and tourism economy is the main form of tourism development. Clear distribution of tourism resources and the current situation of regional tourism's economic development, is the prerequisite and basis for developing tourism cooperation, is of great significance to promote the coordinated development of regional economies.This article studies from ten ASEAN countries and the Guangxi region, it divides tourism patterns into pattern of tourist resource and patterns of tourist economy and propose measures and recommendations accordingly. First, in the classification of tourism resources based on research unit, it studies the breadth, depth and abundance of tourist resources, and it acquires difference conclusion of tourism resources space and space patterns of tourism resources with the analysis of Arc GIS10.0 buffer and the nuclear density analysis tool; second, it clearly studies GDP total amount of tourism in unit and the per capita diversity, and it uses Geoda space analysis tool to obtain the characteristics of space differentiation based on per capita tourism GDP; third, it builds index system and uses SPSS factor analysis and the multi-linear regression tool to get tourism economic integrated level and the drive factor, and it adopts Arc GIS10.0 natural breaks classification analysis tool to get tourism economic pattern;at last, regarding of analysis conclusion and the deficiency it proposes related cooperation path to contribute to regional tourism economic coordination development. the main conclusion s are as follows:(1) Among the international tourism resources of ASEAN and Guangxi area, the proportions of geographical landscape, waters scenery, biological landscape, and astronomical phenomenon and climatic landscape, site remains, buildings and facilities, tourism commodity and the humanities activities accounted for international level tourism resources are followed by for: 5.8%, and 31.16%, and 21.02%, and 0%, and 15.94%, and 26.09%, and 0%, and 0%; national tourism resources in the geographical landscape, waters scenery, biological landscape, astronomical phenomenon and climatic landscape, site remains, building and facilities, tourism commodities, the humanities activities accounted for international level are: 24.74%, 3.09%, 9.28%, 0%, 17.53%, 42.27%, and the 2.06%. The abundance of tourism resources shows obvious difference, ranking followed by Thailand, Vietnam, Indonesia, Malaysia, the Philippines, Guangxi, Singapore, Cambodia, Myanmar, Laos and Brunei.(2) for the capital city's buffer, tourism resources distribute as "u" type with the growth of point buffer distance, natural tourism resources shows distribution regularity of incremental form with increased distribution, humanity tourism resources with increasing distance present like the "u" shaped distribution. Borders(provincial boundaries) to buffer lines, tourism tends to decrease with the increase line buffer distance distribution, concentrated in the 0~50km in the buffer zone, natural tourism resource and tourism resource-buffer distances increased with increasing edge to decrement the distribution.(3) The study area as a whole was " one core, one district, two belts" pattern.,in which " one core " that to Singapore, and Kuala Lumpur of composition of "Humanities tourism resources core area"; "one district" that to Bangkok, and Phnom Penh and Thailand Phuket House(Phuket), and pigment Le he Nepal House(Suratthani Province) composition of "coastal and Buddhist culture mixed tourism resources agglomeration district"; "two belts " that to Kalimantan Shang Bandar Seri Begawan, and Philippines Islands composition of " Tourist resources of marine zones", to Guangxi, Hanoi, Vientiane, Thailand North, and Yangon composition of " Tourist resources of folk customs and border zones ".(4) In research district, tourism GDP per capita shows agglomeration distribution situation but with larger differences, which Moran bulk points analysis results in the high(HH) Quadrant for Malaysia, Brunei, and Singapore, low low(LL) Quadrant for Philippines, Cambodia, Guangxi, Vietnam, and Laos, and Myanmar 6 international area, level(HL) Quadrant for Thailand, low high(LH) Quadrant for Indonesia. Lisa HH cluster analysis results quadrants(diffusion) for Singapore, HL quadrant(polarization) for Thailand, LL quadrants(low) for Guangxi Province, Myanmar, Laos, Cambodia, LH quadrant(transition zone) for Indonesia.For tourism GDP per capita, cold areas are Guangxi Province, Cambodia, Myanmar, Laos, Thailand, while the hot zone for Indonesia and Singapore. It wholely Shows cold in north, hot in south, and cold and hot areas are concentrated.(5) Overall ranking of tourism economy are followed by Singapore, Thailand, Malaysia, Brunei, Vietnam, Indonesia, the Philippines, Laos, Guangxi, Cambodia, Myanmari. Comprehensive development level is quite good and features are different. Its rankings is the same as in international tourist competitiveness rankings.(6) The receptional level of tourism has the biggest impact on the tourism economy's comprehensive level, the second impact is services and economic development levels, and resource endowment influence the third, transportation accessibility with minimal impact.(7) The overall levels of tourism economy including from "West Thailand tourist economic core region", "three Islands tourism economy belt" and "low-level development area in the North", "one core, one belt, one district " spatial distribution patterns.(8) Research unit tourism status quo and deficiencies from the perspective of tourism resources, the tourism economy and industrial organization analysis in order to help research on tourism and economic development in the region. |
PDF Full Text Request