A Comparative Study Of The Reconciliation Between The PEP And The Hanlin Edition Of The Chinese Classical Chinese

This article selects the mainlanders hanlin textbooks and Taiwan junior high school language teaching material in the writings in classical style of overlapping contents in comparative analysis.In the body of the first chapter analyzes the dual language teaching material the influence factors of writing,including internal factors,such as press personnel subject status differences,textbook writing team the perfect degree of the model and research development mechanism,etc.;Changes in the external factors,such as the policy environment,the convergence of the teaching material content censorship and the user needs to produce the strength of the force,etc.The second chapter compares the two version of the writings in classical style teaching material compilation basis,namely mainland compulsory education Chinese course standard "(2011 edition)and Taiwan's national grade 1-9 curriculum guidelines for primary and secondary schools(ninety-seven edition).From two aspects of objective and writing requirements of comparative analysis,found that the two versions are attaches great importance to the students in listening,speaking,reading,writing and other basic ability,for writings in classical style teaching goal,all pay attention to meet the students' learning psychology,pay attention to the continuity at various stages,step by step.To this,the academician version for the proportion of junior high school is grade each Duan Wenyan selected article explicitly request,let BianXuan Zhe know fairly well.Only in appendix 1 o 'clock in his best poems recited recommended title of " the " request,but the proportion of writings in classical style did not make clear requirements for each grade,it gave BianXuan Zhe certain choice space,but also bring more subjective for writing.For writing requirements,the selection of classical Chinese are required to pay attention to the diversification of content,the richness of genre,the writing style should be flexible.But hanlin textbooks pay more attention to students' self learning ability,by providing students with more learning resources,reduce the difficulty of self-study,to promote the transformation of teaching school materials.The third chapter compares the two versions arrangement system.Junior high school on the layout of the selected works of classical Chinese schools are scattered to the whole,increased step by step,distinguished characteristics;Academician version on the layout of the selected works of classical Chinese present a flexible dispersed,the characteristics of the equilibrium distribution.Two versions of the writings in classical style in teaching each has his strong point,advantages and disadvantages coexist,formed certain complementary to each other.The fourth chapter is the comparison of two versions overlap contents in summary analysis,mainly from the selected title and compare the detailed content of selected article,including the selection of words and add or delete content,etc.In terms of selected article title,the a cademician version on the use of more rigorous,accurate,follow the original,emphasis on the inheritance of history;Choose the specific content of different focuses on the difference between punctuation and paragraphs,the choice of words and add or delete content difference is not big.Emotion to the will highlight the performance of this kind of punctuation marks,the academician version of use is more reasonable,in order to " zou avoid biting his king and " as an example for detailed analysis.Fifth chapt er in terms of two versions read system,hanlin than o 'clock is much rich content of the text,set the knowledge more detailed division.In addition,in this paper,the read system occurred mainly in the annotation,the study found that due to the selected version of the source,the differences between the reference translation annotated,and editor considerations,in classical Chinese comments on the accuracy of both there is a problem.This article selects the mainlanders hanlin textbooks and Taiwan junior high school language teaching material in the writings in classical style of overlapping contents in comparative analysis.In the body of the first chapter analyzes the dual language teaching material the influence factors of writing,including internal factors,such as press personnel subject status differences,textbook writing team the perfect degree of the model and research development mechanism,etc.;Changes in the external factors,such as the policy environment,the convergence of the teaching material content censorship and the user needs to produce the strength of the force,etc.The second chapter compares the two version of the writings in classical style teaching material compilation basis,namely mainland compulsory education Chinese course sta ndard "(2011 edition)and Taiwan's national grade 1-9 curriculum guidelines for primary and secondary schools(ninety-seven edition).From two aspects of objective and writing requirements of comparative analysis,found that the two versions are attaches gr eat importance to the students in listening,speaking,reading,writing and other basic ability,for writings in classical style teaching goal,all pay attention to meet the students' learning psychology,pay attention to the continuity at various stages,step by step.To this,the academician version for the proportion of junior high school is grade each Duan Wenyan selected article explicitly request,let BianXuan Zhe know fairly well.Only in appendix 1 o 'clock in his best poems recited recommended title of "the" request,but the proportion of writings in classical style did not make clear requirements for each grade,it gave BianXuan Zhe certain choice space,but also bring more subjective for writing.For writing requirements,the selection of classical Chinese are required to pay attention to the diversification of content,the richness of genre,the writing style should be flexible.But hanlin textbooks pay more attention to students' self learning ability,by providing students with more learning resources,reduce the difficulty of self-study,to promote the transformation of teaching school materials.The third chapter compares the two versions arrangement system.Junior high school on the layout of the selected works of classical Chinese schools are scatter ed to the whole,increased step by step,distinguished characteristics;Academician version on the layout of the selected works of classical Chinese present a flexible dispersed,the characteristics of the equilibrium distribution.Two versions of the writings in classical style in teaching each has his strong point,advantages and disadvantages coexist,formed certain complementary to each other.The fourth chapter is the comparison of two versions overlap contents in summary analysis,mainly from the selected title and compare the detailed content of selected article,including the selection of words and add or delete content,etc.In terms of selected article title,the academician version on the use of more rigorous,accurate,follow the original,emphasis on the inheritance of history;Choose the specific content of different focuses on the difference between punctuation and paragraphs,the choice of words and add or delete content difference is not big.Emotion to the will highlight the performance of this kind of punctuation marks,the academician version of use is more reasonable,in order to "zou avoid biting his king and" as an example for detailed analysis.Fifth chapter in terms of two versions read system,hanlin than o 'clock is much rich content of the text,set the knowledge more detailed division.In addition,in this paper,the read system occurred mainly in the annotation,the study found that due to the selected version of the source,the differences between the reference translation annotated,and editor considerations,in classical Chinese comments on the accuracy of both there is a problem.