The Dialectics Of Nature And History:A Thesis On The Marxistm Critique Of The "Odysseus" Of Adorno's "Philosophy Of Historvy"

Under the influence of Marx,Lukacs,Benjamin and Schoenberg,T.W.Adorno started to build up his own “Philosophy of History” in 1930 s.Adorno took part in the discussion of Kant School in Frankfurt in 1932;he issued “The idea of Natural-History" which is the turning point of his own history of thought.He point out the failure of Phenomenology that could not overcome Idealism and elucidate “The Dialectics of Natural-History” by discussing the idea of nature and history of Lukacs and Benjamin.The core meaning of “The Dialectics of Natural-History” of Adorno is sublating the absolute opposition between Nature and History,to understand Nature in the way of History and catch History naturally.It's the beginning point of Adorno's “Philosophy of History” in the sence of logic.However,Adorno is not the original inventor of “The Dialectics of Natural-History” but the successor of Marxism.Marx claimed that the social and economic development of human is the course of natural-history in The Capital,Nature is the historical nature,and History is the natural history as well,the absolute opposition between Nature and History had been sublated as the result.“The Dialectics of Natural-History” is systematically elucidated in Dialectic of enlightenment for first time,and the work is the foundation of “Philosophy of History” as well.The analysis of Odysseus Goes Home by means of Marxism Political Economy is extensive,profound and peculiar,that is a expression and “The Dialectics of Natural-History” which means the intwinement of Nature and History,The Dialectics of Myth and Enlightenment recount itself through the whole procedure.