| The relationship between alienated labor and private ownership is the focus of Marxist philosophy.Marx ’s classic expression in the “Manuscript of Economics and Philosophy in 1844” “Analysis of this concept shows that although private property appears as the basis and cause of externalized labor,it is precisely the consequence of externalized labor Originally,God was not the cause of human intellectual misunderstanding,but the result of human intellectual misunderstanding.Later,this relationship became an interactive relationship."It has become the focus of many scholars at home and abroad.Many scholars,represented by Japanese scholar Hiromatsu,believed that Marx was caught in a "circular argument".Some scholars in the former Soviet Union believe that the alienated labor and private property that young Marx said are "equal in a certain sense." Chinese scholars have also put forward their own opinions on this issue.For example,Associate Professor Sun Chengzhu of our country put forward the "two kinds of logic theory",Professor Han Lixin put forward the "two kinds of concept theory",and Professor Jiang Haibo and Professor Wang Fengming also from other angles Let’s discuss the relationship between alienated labor and private ownership.However,the mainstream view of our academic circles is different from that of early Japanese scholars,and we have affirmed Marx’s view that alienated labor and private ownership are dialectically unified.So far,no consensus has been formed.China is now in the early stage of socialism.Alienated labor has brought many negative effects in social life.A correct understanding of the relationship between alienated labor and private ownership will help solve the problem of alienation facing our country at this stage.The author believes that the key to correctly revealing the relationship between the two is to start with Marx’s theory of the relationship between labor and ownership.This article consists of four parts.The first part: Combining Marx’s writings,expounding the connotation of Marx’s concepts of ownership,ownership and all forms.Then put forward the four prescriptiveness of all concepts,and grasp Marx’s theory about all from this prescriptiveness.The second part: first analyze the main views of Marx on the relationship between all and labor,and explain that the relationship between labor and all is a dialectical and unified relationship.Then introduce the different opinions of foreign scholars on this view.Part III: On the basis of the dialectical and unified relationship between all and labor,Marx discusses that private ownership is the product and result of alienated labor,and private ownership is the correctness of the prerequisites for alienated labor.It also introduces different opinions of domestic and foreign scholars on the "circular argument".Finally,Marx’s view that alienated labor and private ownership are mutually prescribed is not a "circular argument".Part IV: First,on the basis of Part III,the way to reveal the abandonment of alienated labor is to eliminate private ownership and rebuild individual ownership under communism.And by comparing the individual ownership in the former capitalist social form with the individual ownership in the communist society,it explains what is the individual ownership in the communist society,and then highlights the superiority of the individual ownership in the communist society.Secondly,to discuss that labor liberation is a prerequisite for human liberation,and labor liberation is included in the deeper pursuit of human’s comprehensive and free development.Finally,the ultimate goal pursued by Marx throughout his life is that every individual in life can live a happy and free life.This goal can only be achieved in a communist society. |