Research On The Impact Of Government Investment And Official Rotation On Regional Economic Development

This paper mainly study the effect of official rotation in economic development,and research differences influence of officials from different area on investment.The following conclusions was obtained:The development of each city's economy depends not only on the cities that are close to its geographical location,but also on certain economic interactions with the cities that have political connections.In the spatial Dubin model,based on the official rotation matrix,the coefficient of economic efficiency is significantly positive,and the coefficient reaches 0.4006 in the spatial influence analysis.This shows that there is a certain degree of interaction between total factor productivity among cities with political connections,and official rotation will promote the flow of urban economic factors among cities,so that we can promote exchanges among cities and promote the economic development of the cities.Compared with the economic interaction brought by the proximity of geography,the economic interaction effect brought by official rotation is less significant,the exchange of officials plays an auxiliary role in economic promoting and accelerating.The result of total factor productivity and geographical proximity matrix interaction under geographical proximity is 1.3147.The coefficient is much larger than the coefficient under the influence of political association,indicating that the spillover effect of total factor productivity on neighboring cities is still geographically close to dominant position,and politics linkages have a relatively small economic spillover effect on cities.One of the most important drivers of economic development is investment.From the analysis of officials and investment-driven analysis,local promotion officials have a negative impact on local investment(including completed municipal investment and investment in science and education),while exchange officials has a significant positive effect on invests.In other words,officials rotation can overcome the drawbacks of official turnover in invest.Compared to the existed research results: The replacement of local officials will slow the replacement of the economic growth of the year,from this point of view,the officials come from other place will have a better development momentum than the local promotion officials,which is more conducive to the development of the local economy.According to further analysis in different regions,local promotion officials did not show significant impact on the amount of completed municipal investment and investment in science and education in eastern cities,central cities,western cities,and northeast cities.The exchange officials maintained a high degree of saliency in most of the regional analysis models,which means that even in the case of a large number of sample reductions in sub-regional discussions,the exchange officials still maintained a significant impact on municipal investment and investment in science and education.Explained that the enthusiasm of exchange officials for economic construction is higher than that of local promotion officials.At the same time,in terms of municipal investment,the influence of the Municipal Party committee secretary of the eastern city on the municipal investment is less than that of the Central City.In terms of investment in science and education,the influence of exchange officials in various regions is basically the same,and there is no big difference.