Research On The Construction Of Judges In D City Court

The 19 th National Congress of the Communist Party of China proposed to deepen the comprehensive reform of the judicial system,fully implement the judicial responsibility system,and strive to make the people feel fair in every judicial case justice.The meeting clearly issued the determination of the party and the state to build China into a society ruled by law in depth,and also pointed out that the ultimate goal of judicial system reform is to let the people really I feel fair and just here.Building a harmonious society cannot be separated from a society ruled by law,a society ruled by law cannot be separated from a fair and just trial of cases,and a fair and just trial cannot be separated from the quality of the contingent of judges.Therefore,in order to deepen the judicial system reform and build a harmonious society ruled by law,we must have a regular,professional and professional judge team.According to the logical order of "putting forward the question,analyzing the question and solving the question",this paper takes D City Court of G Province as the research sample.Using comparative analysis,case analysis,historical research and other research methods to conduct in-depth study of the construction of D City Court judge team.After a brief description of the research background and significance of this study and a review of the existing research,this paper first introduces the related concepts of the construction of the contingent of judges.Theoretical basis andThe characteristics are discussed in depth;secondly,the use of case analysis,describes the construction of D City Court judge team status,summed up the position of the judge team set unreasonable.The judicial expertise of the contingent of judges is not strong,the ideological and moral standards of the contingent of judges are not high,and the contingent of judges lacks enthusiasm for work;the hidden safety problems of the contingent of judges are conspicuous and other major problems are discussed from the perspectives of system reasons,selection mechanism,professional growth,incentive mechanism,the reasons for the appeal of the team are analyzed,and then a comparative analysis of the experience and practice of the United States,Canada and other countries in the construction of the contingent of judges is made.Put forward countermeasures and suggestions to strengthen the construction of judges in D City,which are optimizing the existing court administration,creating a good environment for the growth of judges,we should establish a dynamic standard for the number of judges,improve the system of selecting and appointing judges,and carry out systematic training in different levels.We should build an effective on-the-job training system for judges,improve the evaluation system for judges' performance,and strengthen the incentive mechanism and promotion system.It is necessary to set up typical examples for judges,strengthen the ideological and moral construction of judges,solve worries for judges,and improve and stabilize the contingent of judges.Hope can promote The practice of deepening judge professionalization reform in jin-d city has been carried out effectively,which provides reference for our court judge professionalization reform.