Research On Derformance Appraisal Of Judges In Basic Courts Under The Background Of Judicial Responsibility System Reform

The Third Plenary Session of the Eighteenth Central Committee of the CPC pointed out that the overall goal of deepening the reform in an all-round way is to perfect and develop the socialist system with Chinese characteristics,and to promote the modernization of the state governance system and governance capacity.Meng Jianzhu pointed out: "To deepen the reform of the judicial system,we must start from within the judicial organs and from the operation mechanism of judicial power.We must firmly grasp the key to the judicial responsibility system and firmly carry out the tasks of judicial reform.Implementing the judicial responsibility system,promoting the reform of the judicial power operation mechanism,perfecting and perfecting the socialist judicial power operation mechanism with Chinese characteristics,which has clear power and responsibility,unified power and responsibility,orderly supervision and complete set,aims at solving the deep-seated problems affecting judicial justice and restricting judicial ability,and promoting the judicial system and judicial ability.Modernization.The number of cases handled by judges of grass-roots courts accounts for a large share of the country's four-level courts,and most cases are digested in grass-roots courts.Therefore,strengthening the performance appraisal of judges at the grass-roots level has become a problem that needs to be solved urgently.As a result of the trial of judicial reform in batches,each court has formulated a scheme of judge performance appraisal according to its own actual situation.Typical models,such as the traditional model,directly set assessment indicators and give them different scores,artificial scoring,statistics;such as the Shanghai court case weight coefficient of the new model,according to the case classification,using large data to calculate the workload of handling each type of case;Y County People's Court,the introduction of artificial intelligence in the.Based on the merits and demerits of the traditional mode and the Shanghai model,the design of the assessment scheme is scientifically designed.However,at present,some grass-roots courts practice team management,some still retain the original courtyard,the institutional settings are not uniform,the judge performance appraisal program is more diverse.Therefore,the author believes thatlegislation should be improved,top-level design should be strengthened,assessment indicators should be set scientifically,qualitative and quantitative assessment should be unified,at the same time,the participation of evaluation objects should be strengthened,the supervision and statement mechanism of assessment should be improved,artificial intelligence should be introduced,the scientificity of assessment should be improved,and the comprehensive application of assessment results should be emphasized.