| At present,social governance in cities in our country is flourishing,and social governance represented by community autonomy has also developed rapidly.In 2015,the Shanghai Municipal Party Committee and Municipal Government put forward the “1+6” document of social governance with the slogan “Innovate Social Governance,Strengthen Grassroots Construction”,and proposed a series of institutional requirements for the governance of the grassroots society in Shanghai,and also proposed the community autonomy in Shanghai.New hopes and goals.On the one hand,Shanghai ’ s community autonomy,community autonomy,and community autonomy are leading the country and are the vanguards of nationwide community autonomy.On the other hand,there are many problems in Shanghai’s community autonomy.Contradictions,among which the problems between the neighborhood committees and the industry committees have become an important point on the road to the further development of Shanghai’s community autonomy.Why are there so many problems and contradictions between the two? What are the root causes of these problems and contradictions? Where does this contradiction lead to the relationshipbetween the two? Is there any possibility of this contradiction being resolved? What is the future direction of community autonomy in Shanghai?These are issues that need to be discussed and resolved urgently.Urban community autonomy,its essential goal is that the community can achieve self-governance by its members,better protect its own rights and interests,and more satisfy the spiritual material needs of different members,so as to achieve good governance and good governance of the community,so these goals The relationship between community self-governance and self-governance in public affairs is linked,and community autonomy is just in line with the discussion of the theory of self-governance in public affairs.The theory of self-governance in public affairs has eight principles,which can be summed up in four points:a clear will for self-government,autonomous autonomous groups,reasonable autonomy,and excellent autonomy.Since community autonomy is essentially an autonomous governance of public affairs,it is possible to conduct detailed studies under the framework of the self-governance theory of public affairs and to use this new perspective to look at the above issues,identify the nature of the problem,and analyze the contradictory The reason and forecast the future relationship between the two.This article goes deep into the investigation and research of Z Street in Shanghai,and thoroughly understands the development of community self-governance in Z streets through interviews,records,and forums.In particular,it conducts meticulous investigations on the situation of neighborhood committees and industry committees in various communities in Z streets.Understand and obtain first-hand information on the neighborhood committee’s business relationship and conduct further analysis and research.From the research status and theoretical analysis,this article findsthat under the self-governance theory of public affairs,the self-governance of residents’ committees and industry committees is based on government incentives,and the other party is mainly based on government incentives.In autonomous organizations,One party is mainly administratively led,while the other is mainly individual operation;in terms of autonomy,one party is mainly driven passively,and the other party is mainly active exploration;in terms of autonomy,one party is mainly government-supplied,and the other is The owner introduced the main.Therefore,because the neighborhood committees and the industry committees will have the above differences in autonomy,the self-government neighborhood committees and the industry committees will also have three contradictions in the collaborative work.First,the contradictions arising from the industry committees;Yes,the contradiction arising from community resources;Third,the contradiction arising from the right to community governance;and the deep-seated reasons for these contradictions can be further analyzed under theories.Therefore,the final conclusion of this paper is that the two will move toward a deeper level of cooperation in the collaborative work.Finally,this paper also provides relevant countermeasures and suggestions for the in-depth cooperation between the two,such as establishing an interactive communication mechanism,creating a role swap mechanism,and implementing third parties.Trusteeship mechanism,implementation of incentives and protection mechanisms. |
