| The present paper is a comparative study of the post-tutorial commentary section in the reading-aid-system of the mandatory teaching materials for high school students published by the People’s Education Press as well as in the mandatory teaching materials for high school students published by Han Lin Publishing,precisely comparing the seven classical texts“The Candle’s Return to the Division of Qin”(烛之武退秦师),“The Teacher Says”(师说),“Banquet”(鸿门宴),“The Orchid Pavilion Collection”(兰亭集序),“The Pipa Tune”(琵琶行)and“Red Cliff Rhapsody”(赤壁赋),all found in both publications.When comparing the post-tutorial commentary parts on the six identical texts in the two publications,they are being carefully extracted and divided into two categories,added content(words)and comments.The data were entered in a separate document and used as raw data to analyze the results of data digitization using professional data analysis software.Finally,combining the data obtained from the analysis with the actual situation of the notes and texts,a comprehensive comparative analysis of the post-tutorial annotations of the identical classical texts of the two editions of textbooks and the combination of macroscopic and microscopic data supported by the data were conducted in order to find similarities and differences in the construction,content,writing concepts of the two editions of textbooks in the reading-aid-system for classical texts as well as to find and discuss possibilities to learn from each other. |