A Study On The Consistency Of Chemistry Level Examination And Curriculum Standards In Xinjiang Junior Middle School

With the advancement of the new curriculum reform,the quality and evaluation feedback of the junior high school chemistry academic examination papers need to be timely and pertinent.The evaluation of junior middle school academic level examination is the main basis for students to enter higher institutions,and it is also the only criterion that schools can measure the advantages and disadvantages of students when they choose students.under the current curriculum reform system,its importance is self-evident.And the examination questions of junior middle school academic level examination evaluation are also one of the important directions of teachers' teaching.The research on the consistency between the examination paper of chemistry level examination and the curriculum standard of the new curriculum reform in Xinjiang junior middle school is still in the initial state,and no overall and comprehensive research and analysis has been carried out for the time being.Based on the above,this study draws on the United States' consistency analysis model,the SEC analysis model,to take the unified examination papers in the chemistry examinations in Xinjiang from 2014 to 2018 and the autonomous test papers in Urumqi as the main research object.The three dimensions of dimensions and cognitive levels analyze the consistency of the papers in the past five years and the curriculum standards(2011 edition),in order to provide some teaching references for the first-line teachers in Xinjiang.The article begins with the background of consistency research,illustrates the purpose of consistency research,and the positive significance of consistency research to teachers and schools.After that,the domestic and international research status of the consistency study is summarized.The foreign countries mainly explain the research and development of the United States,the United Kingdom,Canada and other countries,and introduce three main analysis modes.The domestic research status is based on time and is introduced separately.Since 2006,most of our literature journals on consistency studies have been published.In the theoretical foundation,the concepts of junior high school level examination,curriculum standards,academic evaluation and consistency study are explained.Then,using the statistical method,the statistical examination and analysis of the unified examination papers in the middle school chemistry examinations in the period of 2014-2018 and the autonomous proposition papers in Urumqi were carried out,and then the consistency index P value was calculated according to the Pat consistency calculation formula.According to the data obtained,draw a chart,analyze the consistency of the test papers,the Urumqi self-professional test papers and the curriculum standards in the "content dimension","cognitive dimension" P-value comparison and unified examination papers,Urumqi self-proposition papers The "Principal Questions" and "Subjective Questions" are compared with the consistency of the curriculum standards in the "content dimension" and "cognitive dimension".Finally,according to the analysis,it is concluded that compared with the Wushu papers,the overall consistency of the examination papers and the curriculum standards is better;compared with the examination papers,the consistency of the U-test papers and the curriculum standards in the “content dimension” is different.Compared with the Wushu papers,the consistency between the examination papers and the curriculum standards is better in the “cognitive dimension”;the “objective questions” and the curriculum standards of the Wushu papers and the examination papers are in the “content dimension” and “cognitive dimension”."The consistency is similar;the "subjective questions" of the Wushu papers and the examination papers and the curriculum standards have a great consistency in the "content dimension" and the "cognitive dimension";the Wushu papers and the examination papers have a whole knowledge point in design.Coverage,but there are differences in the focus of the examination,and the author's own recommendations are made in response to the above conclusions.At the end of the article,the shortcomings in the research are summarized.The author believes that there is no research and analysis tool on the consistency of curriculum standards in China.They are all based on foreign research tools for analysis and research after the transformation of the scholars,and the refinement of coding.distributed.