Font Size: a A A

Contrast And Bias Analysis Of "X Extremely", "X Extremely" And "X Extremely Strong" In The Extreme Structure

Posted on:2020-08-13Degree:MasterType:Thesis
Country:ChinaCandidate:X Y XieFull Text:PDF
GTID:2435330578460463Subject:Master's degree in Chinese International Education
Abstract/Summary:PDF Full Text Request
The survey found that international students often use their extreme structures "X dehen(X ??)","X jile(X??)"and "X debudeliao(X ????)”to express their opinions and feelings when speaking and writing.But the vast majority of students are simply think that these three predicate structure of"X"is to act by the adjective and three structures can be used interchangeably,They don't know their characteristics in terms of semantics,syntax,and the qualifications of the temi"X",so they often have errors.This paper mainly analyzes the three structures from three aspects:semantics,syntax and pragmatics,and then investigates the errors in the use of these three structures by investigating the interlanguage corpus.Finally,make a bias analysis and propose corresponding teaching suggestions.The introduction part mainly explains the research objectives,research significance,research status,research methods and source of corpus.The first chapter is mainly ontology research,which mainly studies the three extreme structures from three aspects:semantics,syntax and pragmatics.In terms of semantics,the semantics of the three are firstly summarized.Secondly,the semantic depths of the three are compared.That is,"X dehen(X ??)"is used to state a high degree of subjective feelings,"Xjile(X ??)"is used to indicate the subjective feeling that the degree has reached the limit,and "X debudeliao(X ????)"is expressed in an exaggerated tone that exceeds the expected level.Therefore,"X debudeliao(X ????)”has the deepest semantics,followed by "Xjile(X??)"and finally "X dehen(X ??)".Finally,we compare and analyze their semantic features,mainly from three aspects:blur and abstraction,high degree of justice and subjectivity.In terms of syntax,we first examine the selection and classification of the predicate "X",mainly from the comparative analysis of adjectives,verbs and nouns.Then we discuss the syntactic conditions of the three structures,mainly examining their use as predicates,objects,attributives,adverbials,complements,and with objects.In addition,we also discussed the situation when the "X" is negative.Finally,we discussed the three aspects of sentence selection,mainly from Ba construction(???),Bei construction(???J),Comparative sentences(L???),and whether to add inflections after.In the aspect of pragmatics,we analyze and demonstrate mainly from the aspects of emotional color,stylistic color,rhetorical effect expressed by structure and the focus of the three.The first chapter is the focus of this paper,which also lays a foundation for the error analysis and teaching Suggestions.The second chapter mainly analyzes the errors and reasons of the errors caused by the use of these three maximal structures.This paper mainly summarizes eight kinds of errors such as omission of "DE"character,misapplication of comparative words and sentences,adding other adverbs by mistake and misapplication of negative sentences,and analyzes the reasons for the errors.The third chapter analyzes the errors based on the ontology research and the analysis of the types of errors,and then proposes teaching suggestions.In view of the bias categories in Chapter 2,combined with the ontology research in the first chapter,we put forward some suggestions for teachers'teaching,that is,teachers should follow the principle of easy to difficult,step by step,and pay attention to the interpretation of language features,focusing on discriminating teaching.Pay attention to special cases and fixed matching,and help students to summarize in time.In the last part of conclusion,we review the whole paper and summarize the whole paper.
Keywords/Search Tags:Polaris structure, Comparative study, Errors analysis, instructional strategy
PDF Full Text Request
Related items