Old And New Biology Curriculum Standards And PEP High Comparative Study Of Biological Materials

This article through to the ordinary high school biology curriculum standard(experiment)"(hereinafter referred to as the" experimental version of the standard)and the ordinary high school biology curriculum standard(2017 edition)"(hereinafter referred to as the" 2017 edition standard)compare and ordinary high school schools are the old and new teaching material comparative study of the molecular and cellular module,in biology textbooks for high schools published by people's education press people biological textbooks for high schools(2004 edition)and people(2019 edition)of the molecular and cellular module as the research object,using literature analysis,text analysis,comparative study,Compare and analyze the two versions objectively.Firstly,it introduces the research background,research method,significance and definition of related concepts.Based on the comparison of the overall framework,curriculum philosophy,curriculum objectives and curriculum content of the curriculum standards,it can be found that :(1)the curriculum philosophy of the 2017 edition is integrated and improved on the basis of the experimental edition;(2)in the 2017 version of the standard,the core quality of the discipline is added,and three-dimensional goals are integrated into it to form a new module,so as to reshape the course objectives of the experimental version of the standard;(3)the 2017 version of the standard is optimized in the course structure.The 2017 version of the standard increases the range of students' choice of course modules and course types,and reduces the learning burden of students;(4)the 2017 version of the standard has refined the course content,with a more clear way of expression,more in line with the learning content of students' age.And then,to the old version of high school biology teaching material comparative analysis,respectively from the writing style,the chapter content,teaching material side bar,illustrations,inquiry activity teaching materials,teaching material problem,the experiment part carries on the comparison to the two versions,found that:(1)2019 edition teaching materials more close to the curriculum standard in terms of writing style,embodies the course standard in the related module of curriculum idea;(2)in the arrangement of chapter contents,more attention is paid to the cohesion of the content before and after,and some chapters are integrated;(3)the columns of textbooks are added and deleted,which are more in line with the age characteristics of students;(4)more "Chinese","figurative" and "soft" in the textbook illustrations;In part of the concept expression of the textbook,it reflects the "essence","precision","science" and "perfection".Finally,through the selection of relevant chapter content from the teaching materials for the teaching design to show the teaching materials,and reflect the intention of the curriculum standards,the construction of curriculum standards-teaching materials-teaching design three levels of integration.