| The literature on how knowledge is managed by radical innovators is embryonic, and the domain is still being mapped out. With this thesis, we aim to further the understanding of how small software firms (SSFs) manage knowledge and organize internally to generate breakthrough innovations. Our two research questions are formulated as follows: (Q1) How do SSFs create, transfer, retain, and protect their knowledge? (Q2) How do SSFs organize internally to manage their knowledge?;The first question (Q1) refers to the management of knowledge in SSFs engaged in breakthrough innovation activities. In this study we explored four knowledge management processes: knowledge creation, transfer, retention, and protection. The second question (Q2) concerns SSFs' organizational settings. We investigated SSFs' physical infrastructures, organizational structures, organizational cultures, and information technology tools, a set of variables that we called "knowledge organizational infrastructure". In order to answer these two questions, five cases of SSFs engaged in breakthrough innovation activities were explored.;The setting of this research is the Canadian software industry. This industry is the most important and fastest growing component of the Canadian Information and Communication Technology (ICT) sector since 1997 (Industry Canada, 2006).;The research design is explorative multiple-case studies (Yin, 2003; Eisenhardt, 1989). Data was collected through diverse sources including, semi-structured interviews, non-participant observations, internal documents, and public data. This research follows an interpretative approach, since phenomena is understood through the meanings people assign to them. The five explored SSFs were analyzed through the lenses of the knowledge management (Nonaka, 1994) and resource-based view (Penrose, 1959) perspectives. This study extends the literature examining "knowledge management processes" and "knowledge organizational infrastructures" in SSFs seeking to generate radical innovation.;We found that SSFs put in place specific knowledge management processes, to mange knowledge, and particular knowledge organizational infrastructures, to organize internally and enable knowledge management processes. By analyzing the specificities of SSFs' "knowledge management processes" and "knowledge organizational infrastructures" and the way these "processes" and "infrastructures" relate to each other in each explored SSF, we created a "taxonomy of small radical innovating firms". We propose five ideal organization types: (1) "collaborative"; (2) "artistic"; (3) "formalized"; (4) "synergistic"; and (5) "balanced".;We argue that classifying small radical innovating firms into a taxonomy of ideal organizational types helps scholars and practitioners to better understand specific relationships between knowledge management processes and knowledge organizational infrastructures, and elucidate the way those relationships influence the generation process of radical innovation.;What emerges from our data is that radical innovation processes in SSFs are strongly influenced by the particularities of their knowledge organizational infrastructure, knowledge management processes, and technological mainstream activities.;Keywords: small firms, software industry, knowledge management processes, knowledge organizational infrastructure, breakthrough innovation. |
