Suggestions For Perfecting Legal Decision Of Local Ecological Environment

Today,when industrialization is growing more rapidly,the risks facing humanity are more complex and the possible consequences are more severe.Among them,the risks related to the ecological environment are even more intractable,because in the global village where we live,changes in the ecological environment need to consider the interaction of many factors.At the same time,science brings us the biggest cognition which is its limitation.At the same time,it also increases people’s doubts about ecological environment decision-making and worry and panic about new risks in ecological environment decision-making.With the deepening of the understanding of risk control,the essence of risk regulation for local ecological environment decision-making is to overcome the subjective bias of decision makers under the premise of high uncertainty and to balance the interests of all parties to the maximum extent and make the whole society benefit.In order to achieve the goal of risk control,we should first pay attention to the utility of science in the decision-making process,although the limitations of science are inevitable,but it is still an important reference for decision-making.Secondly,in order to make up for the limitations of science and overcome the subjective bias of decision-makers,we should allow more voices to appear in the decision-making process.In order to achieve the goal of risk regulation,we should first pay attention to the utility of science in the decision-making process,although the limitations of science are inevitable,but it is still an important reference for decision-making.Secondly,in order to make up for the limitations of science and overcome the subjective bias of decision-makers,we should allow more voices to appear in the decision-making process.Finally regulate the legitimacy of decision-making,prevent private rights from being unreasonably harmed by decision-making,and allow private rights to perform remedies when they are violated.The use of scientific tools in the decision-making process should be constrained by the concept of risk assessment.The decision-making organ shall fulfill the obligation of information disclosure to the public in accordance with the law,inform the public before making the decision of the scientific basis,source and existing limitations or uncertainties of the decision,and also have the obligation to supplement the explanation and organize the adjustment of the decision after making the decision.In the process of decision-making,motions involving specific situations such as personal interests,big differences,public concern and professional competence should be forced to hold hearings,so that public discussions can effectively restrict the subjective tendency of decision-making organs;in order to regulate the legitimacy of decision-making,the role of post-supervision should be strengthened.According to the requirements of our country’s legal system for the examination of legislation filing,we should carry out the original intention of the system design and strengthen the effect of the examination and supervision of the upper law.