| Network deliberative democracy has rich connotation.As an important part of modern democratic system,it refers to the new consultative democracy practice mode formed by relying on network technology.In a certain sense,network deliberative democracy is the organic unity of network democracy and deliberative democracy.With the application and development of contemporary information technology,network deliberative democracy has gradually entered the research field of vision and become a new realization form for citizens to participate in political life.Network deliberative democracy of socialism with Chinese characteristics is rooted in the soil of Chinese democratic politics and is an important form and content of deliberative democracy of socialism with Chinese characteristics.It uses the Internet as the media to conduct extensive public discussions and exchange opinions and appeals on the exchange platform built by the Internet,with the goal of realizing the greatest common divisor of public interests.It truly embodies the true meaning of the people as masters of socialist democracy with Chinese characteristics.Centering on the realization of network deliberative democracy,this paper defines and differentiates the concept of network deliberative democracy on the basis of sorting out and reviewing relevant literatures at home and abroad,and explains the basic content of relevant basic theories and the realization significance of network deliberative democracy.Based on the practice of network deliberative democracy,this paper points out that the development of network deliberative democracy is conducive to guaranteeing citizens’ political participation,expanding the public sphere of deliberative democracy and innovating the governance model of deliberative democracy,thus promoting deliberative democracy to a new height.At present,online deliberative democracy is making continuous progress in its exploration and forming new advantages of democratic politics.But from the practical point of view,it still faces some operational challenges,such as the risk of information technology alienation,digital inequality,insufficient institutional supply and so on.In order to better guide the continuous improvement of network deliberative democracy,this paper puts forward the following countermeasures and suggestions:First,strengthen the supply of consultation procedure design system,and realize the procedural and standardization of network deliberative democracy from the perspective of horizontal and vertical,combining with the supervision mechanism and links;Second,to give more social value to information technology and enhance the reliability of information technology application so as to deepen the recognition degree of consultative democracy to information technology;Third,clearly define the roles and responsibilities of the government,and show the government’s responsibility and wisdom in absorbing online public opinion,optimizing the legislative mechanism,and strengthening citizen construction.Fourth,the political culture of deliberative democracy is cultivated.It aims to realize multi-level and multi-field consultation and supervision and better play the positive role of network deliberative democracy in opinion aggregation and coordination and interaction by improving the level of individual citizens,governments and non-governmental organizations.The innovation of this paper is to discuss how to further promote the realization of network deliberative democracy by taking the network space as the negotiation field.Under the trend of network deliberative democracy changing from theoretical discussion to practical design,the research of this paper can enrich the theory of deliberative democracy to some extent and promote the multi-level and institutionalized development of practice.It is not only conducive to breaking the dilemma of contemporary development,avoiding the negative effects of network technology and causing governance dilemma,but also conducive to the development of socialist democratic politics with Chinese characteristics and enhancing citizens’ sense of identity and trust in the government. |
