| In the context of the connotative development of higher education in the new era,the construction of high-quality courses is the breakthrough to improve the quality of undergraduate education.Classroom teaching is the primary link of talent cultivation in colleges and universities."Gold Course",as a new pattern and value pursuit of curriculum reform and development,is also an important means of improving teaching quality.Students are the main participants of the course,and exploring the characteristics of the "gold course" from the perspective of students can provide thinking and reference for the construction of the "gold course".This research takes the x university third grade undergraduate as the investigation object,uses the questionnaire and the Interview Union Empirical Investigation,from the four dimensions of curriculum objective,curriculum content,curriculum implementation and curriculum evaluation,this paper probes into the identity and realistic expectation of the ideal characteristics of "golden curriculum",and through the analysis of the dual attitude of students,thinking and using for reference to build high-quality undergraduate "gold course".Through the analysis of 195 valid questionnaires and 14 in-depth interviews,the students hold a high approval attitude to the ideal characteristics of "gold course".The overall mean of the degree of identification is 4.30,which is much higher than the theoretical mean of 3,and the mean of each dimension is 4.39,4.28,4.35 and 4.18 respectively,which is also higher than the theoretical mean of 3,it shows that the description of the ideal characteristics of the "gold course" in the questionnaire is highly in line with the students' perception of the "gold course".However,through the analysis of interview and questionnaire,the realistic expectation of the characteristics of "golden lessons" can be summarized as follows: practical utility-oriented,satisfying the close-range goal,paying attention to interesting and useful,easy to master;Learning motivation depends on external motivation,pay attention to shallow happy learning,maintain the original assessment system,content to change but easy to score.It can be concluded that there is a difference between the approbation of the ideal characteristics of the"golden curriculum" and the students' realistic expectation At the level of curriculum content,it is easy to seek refuge;at the level of curriculum implementation,it is more inclined to shallow happy learning;at the level of curriculum evaluation,it is self-interested.Based on the analysis of the differences between the identification of the ideal characteristics and the realistic expectations of the "gold course",this paper sums up the possible causes of the differences based on the three levels of students,teachers and universities,that is to say,the identity of the ideal characteristics of "gold lessons" is in the state of "unconsciousness",and the realistic expectation of "gold lessons" is too self-centered and utilitarian.Through the analysis of the reasons for the differences,it can be concluded that there is a relative deviation between the professional training and students' demands in colleges and universities,the construction of"gold course" is too ideal,the implementation of the student-oriented concept in course teaching is not in place,and the process of "gold course" is not in-depth.In view of this,to build the "gold course" from the perspective of students,we should continue to deepen the teaching reform of the course and strive to promote the construction of the "gold course";face up to the differences between the ideal and the reality,and pay attention to students' reasonable demands;teachers should stick to the principle of being a teacher,to implement the student-oriented concept;students to "return to common sense" and consciously promote in-depth learning;school teaching,learning,management tripartite efforts to create a unique"gold course. |
PDF Full Text Request