| Through the research and sorting of the achievements of the predecessors,we find that the academic community mostly describes single and single groups of adverbs of frequency,but the discrimination of synonymous adverbs with high semantic similarity is insufficient,and the research on the hidden category differences implied by the differences in the syntactic of the surface is lacking,which is easy to bias the second language learners in the learning process.Therefore,by screening the meanings of all adverbs of frequency in the grammatical outline of the "Chinese Proficiency Grading Standards for International Chinese Language Education",three groups of adverbs with different frequencies are obtained,and the comparative research method and statistical induction method are used to investigate the explicit differences of the three groups of adverbs of frequency to explore the hidden differences between adverbs of frequency of synonyms,and further excavate the adverbs of synonymous frequency.This article is mainly divided into the following five parts:The first part is an introduction.It mainly focuses on seven aspects: the reason for the topic selection,the research purpose,the research status,the research object,the research idea,the research method,and the source of the corpus.This paper provides a detailed overview of the research status of the attribution,scope,classification and other issues of frequency adverbs.The second part describes the screening criteria and selection process for adverbs of synonymous frequency.Mainly relying on the comparison and interchange of Chinese-English interpretations to investigate and screen the adverbs of synonymous frequencies,it was determined that the research objects in this paper were near-sense low-frequency adverbs: You Shi,Ou Er;Synonymous adverbs of intermediate frequency frequency: Chang,Chang Chang,Jing Chang;Synonymous adverbs of high-frequency frequencies: Lao(Shi),Zong(Shi).The third part first reviews and summarizes the existing studies on the low-frequency near-sense adverbs "You Shi" and "Ou Er",combines the errors of the two,further explores their explicit syntax differences on the basis of the existing studies,finds out the irreplaceable example sentences,analyzes the reasons why they are irreplaceable,and reveals the differences of the near-sense adverbs of frequency.The author tries to analyze the causes of the differences from three perspectives:meaning differences,sentence position differences,and state category differences.The fourth part examines the intermediate frequency synonyms "Chang","Chang Chang" and "Jing Chang",and regards "Chang" as the basis for "Chang Chang" and "Jing Chang"."Chang" obtains "Chang Chang" and "Jing Chang" after grammatical overlap or other morphemes,which obtains the continuity of semantic strength of the three,and focuses on the sentence position differences of "Chang","Chang Chang" and "Jing Chang",and summarizes the hidden category differences of the three.The fifth part examines the high-frequency synonymous adverbs " Lao(Shi)" and "Zong(Shi)",discusses the mechanism of "Lao" and "Zong" each through metaphor and other ways to blur into adverbs,represented by " Lao Shi" and "Zong Shi",while discussing the explicit differences,focuses on the subjectivization and tone evaluation functions of the two.The sixth part is the epilogue.Summarize the comparative content of the whole text,point out the shortcomings of the research,and further look forward to the research direction. |
