Font Size: a A A

An Experimental Study On The Influence Of CrossFit Training On The Teaching Effect Of Public Sports Basketball Class In Colleges And Universities

Posted on:2024-07-02Degree:MasterType:Thesis
Country:ChinaCandidate:X C TianFull Text:PDF
GTID:2557307058979939Subject:Physical Education
Abstract/Summary:
Cross Fit training is a new comprehensive physical fitness training method that comprehensively improves training effectiveness through various aerobic and anaerobic cross training.It has been widely studied and applied in multiple fields in the United States and European countries.This study aims to actively implement the guiding requirements of the Outline for university physical education courses,improve the problems of traditional public sports basketball classroom teaching content being dull,training methods being outdated,and teaching methods being single,and apply the Cross Fit training method to the teaching of university public sports basketball courses.Using the methods of literature review,psychological measurement,expert interview,experiment,mathematical statistics and logical analysis,this paper studies the influence of Cross Fit training method on the teaching effect of college public sports basketball class.The experimental subjects were 60 students from Shandong Normal University’s 2021 public sports basketball course.The experimental group of 30 received Cross Fit training,while the control group of 30 received traditional physical fitness training.By organically integrating Cross Fit training with teaching content,this study investigates the impact of Cross Fit training on four aspects of college students’ body composition,interest in sports learning,basketball skills,and physical fitness.Through analysis and research,the following results and conclusions are drawn:result:(1)In terms of body composition,independent sample T-tests were conducted between the experimental group and the control group after the experiment,and there was no significant difference in height,weight,BMI,body fat rate,visceral fat,and protein(P>0.05);There was significant difference in basal metabolism(P<0.05).(2)In terms of interest in sports learning,the experimental group and the control group underwent independent sample T-tests after the experiment,and there was no significant difference in extracurricular activities and sports attention(P>0.05);There is a significant difference in positivity,skill learning,and negativity(P<0.01).(3)In terms of basketball skills,the experimental group and the control group underwent independent sample T-tests after the experiment,and there was no significant difference in the scores of self throwing,self grabbing,and total scores(P>0.05);There is a significant difference between the running basket score and the actual combat score(P<0.05).(4)In terms of physical fitness,the experimental group and the control group conducted independent sample T test after the training experiment,and there was no significant difference in vital capacity and sitting forward flexion(P>0.05);There was a significant difference(P<0.05)in the fifty meter run,standing long jump,pull-up,and one kilometer run.Conclusion:(1)Both Cross Fit training and traditional fitness training can effectively improve the level of basal metabolism,but Cross Fit training is better than traditional fitness training in improving basal metabolism.Cross Fit training also has a certain effect on the change of visceral fat.(2)Both Cross Fit training and traditional physical fitness training can increase students’ extracurricular activities and increase their attention to sports.Moreover,Cross Fit training has better effects than traditional physical fitness training in improving enthusiasm,reducing negativity,and strengthening skill learning.Research has shown that Cross Fit training can comprehensively enhance students’ interest in physical education learning.Therefore,adding new training methods in the teaching process can stimulate students’ interest in learning and improve teaching effectiveness.(3)After Cross Fit training,the running basket score and actual combat score have improved significantly,and the effect is better than that of traditional physical training.The reason is that Cross Fit training methods are progressiveness and interesting,and the fast conversion of training mode rhythm is more suitable for actual combat.(4)Cross Fit training has little change in vital capacity and flexibility compared with traditional physical training,but it can significantly improve the explosive force of lower limbs,speed quality,upper limb strength and endurance quality.
Keywords/Search Tags:Experimental
Related items