The Comparison Research Of Sino-foreign Adminisrtration Accoutability System

The administrative accountability system concerns that the particular accountability subject supervises the administrative authority of the administrative organization and its staff, and pursues the responsibility of the administrative behavior by mistake. Based on the principle of'responsible government', it can efficiently establish the responsible government, prevent the power from being corrupted, and guarantee the public interests against loss or minimizing the loss, which aims to promise the government system's normal operation. The administrative accountability system can not equal in brief to the government's administrative self-discipline mechanism, also differ from the mechanism of the responsibility pursue and that of the resignation for the blame. According to comparison in the Western civilization achievements made by law and the administrative accountability systems between the Chinese and the Western, this text will be able to perfect our state's present administrative accountability system in order to benefit our responsible government's construction.The whole Passage can be divided in to six parts:Chapter one mainly sets forth the great significance and its background, analyses the main researching fruit, known viewpoints and differences, studies problems in foregone research and the appraisals to it,and introduces the basic train of thoughts, the key, the difficulties, as well as the main research methods and the innovation.The second part is about the basic theoretical analysis of the administrative accountability system. The article studies the administrative accountability system based on the concept of the accountability system, and then the theoretical origin of the administrative accountability system based on the people's sovereignty, the social responsibility, and the rule of law, and the administrative accountability system in the contemporary features from four aspects of the analysis.The third part compares the subjects,the objects and the scopes between the Chinese and Western accountability systems. The Western accountability subjects are all at the order place, emphasizing the different accountabilities. The assignments of the government's power and responsibility are clear, which explicit the accountability object; the accountability's scope is definite and extensive. Our state administrative accountability system's is concerned with, at present, accountability's overflow, different accountability's absence and shortage, the assignments of the power and responsibility's confusion, the objects unclearness, and the accountability scope's narrow and ambiguity.The fourth part makes the comparison in methods, procedures and responsibility undertaken between the Chinese and Western administrative accountabilities. Abroad and especially in the western developed countries, accountability is distinctively different, but the principal applications are more complete, the responsibility more concrete and systematic. On the contrary, it is our state that is for lack of the administrative accountability procedures, which emphasizes the substantial bodies but neglects the procedures.The fifth part of the administrative accountability system of a typical case was analyzed. The Watergate, Ma Jingsong buying a car (in Hong Kong, in the area of China), and the mainland of china SARS case of the accountability of the subcommission.According to comparisons in the administrative accouniability systems between the Chinese and Western, the sixth part draws a conclusion that is to take the specific measures to perfect our state's administrative accountability system..