Appointed Leadership Positions In The Civil Service Nomination System Of The Initial

Cause of the rise and fall, however, on the employer; employing the To, focusing on orientation. Guidance does not, selection and appointment will lose the right direction, loss of public trust, the initial source of the nomination is set-oriented. In the current elected leadership positions in the civil service system, the initial focus is the nomination before selecting knowledge is based on ideological and political quality, level of education, qualifications and actual performance, and other historical point to make the evaluation, the district moved into position and promoted to the exchange adjustment, etc., press the "regulations" the principle of selecting and employing people to clear criteria, rigorous procedures, the forms of democracy, the past and produce scientific and rational way aspiring candidates.The initial nomination is a critical and sensitive work areas, existing practices are summed up in practice, the practice can be roughly divided into two organizations to nominate individuals signed nomination, individuals nominated jointly introduce ourselves and the people and nominate a few style competition species, but the theory and practice circles on the "initial nomination," the definition is always in a benevolent see benevolence and the wise see wisdom in the state, there is no uniform standard, resulting in Practice is also varied, form, color each one, it is difficult to make limited scientific system.Currently, the appointment of civil servants in leadership positions in the initial nomination of the main problems facing: First, the system is imperfect, difficult to guarantee the democratic rights of the masses of cadres, cadres and the masses to participate based on recommendations in the vote, compared to the results and ignorant in the role of the state, are not enthusiastic high, the results of the authenticity, accuracy can be questionable. Second, the measure is not clear, program virtual home serious. On the one hand is the ability and political integrity of the employment standards and policies and regulations of the scale, relies entirely on the subjective understanding, vary, it is difficult reunification. On the other hand the annual and daily assessment is not public or known to only a small area, the general cadre, ordinary people can only be subjective assumptions, presided over the name of both the intent of the cadres and the masses will pave the way a potential guide. Third, non-transparent operation can not be effective oversight, the candidates difficult to guarantee credibility. "Black box operation" caused by information asymmetry, so that people feel "fooled", it is offensive, or drift, or random put together, and the process of anomie, and then the inevitable result of distortion. Fourth, the responsibility is unknown, difficult to trace. Substance is often due to external interference and aliasing through and become real "walking program," resulting in "On the surface quite satisfactory," the illusion, the real manifestation of the will of the minority, even if the verified action to cancel the nomination qualifications and not find to be held responsible for the nomination of the main body. Causes of such problems arising, first, ideas entangled in the historical tradition and the market economy was the value of two-factor, the deepest effect; Second, the initial nomination is too focused on the "number one" or a few hands, or the general public is difficult to contend poor access; Third, discrepancies in understanding the information asymmetry lead to loss of public anomie; fourth is subject to administrative interference from poor ecological environment, so often, people take the initiative to give up the fight, but to "evil" way of self preservation .