Good Governance From The Perspective Of Management Of Rural Grassroots Democracy

Village self-government is following the household contract responsibility system, township and village enterprises, after the third time in the rural areas carried out by revolutionary change, is the Chinese people once again the crystallization of collective wisdom is to explore the practice of farmers in the management of rural areas, construction of rural development the correct path in rural areas, began in the early eighties, Yi Shan County, Guangxi, Battalion and 85 co-founded by the mass peasant self-organization - the village committee and quickly by the party and the state, as well as people of all nationalities of the widespread concern The state closely, the law provides for them, and in other parts of trial results prove its feasibility, "four democracies," as the core of village autonomy have been proposed, and in practice in the localities in the country vigorously , some scholars shouted when the superiority of democratic management, and some in-depth survey of rural grass-roots level scholars have issued a strange voice, the villagers self-government in some areas has not been thoroughly implemented, and democratic management did not achieve the desired results, on the contrary, Since the state into a system of self-government to replace the original model of governance, which has no real self-government model established, did not follow our set of "good governance" road development, and in some villages but there was an "arbitrary rule" phenomenon.This article is based on this phenomenon, combined with S the actual situation of the village and, according to the order of description of the democratic management in the implementation of the village, as well as in real life, the results obtained on the village how the role of governance is to promote democratic management of the village is the role of little effect, or disrupt the order of the original village. Through the process of democratic management and democratic management of village description, we can see wide implementation in rural areas there are many non-democratic management of "democracy" phenomenon exist, and it is these factors that led to undemocratic governance in several villages in confusion, then what factors have led to the existence of these factors, it is undemocratic in a village to do a full range of perspective, to observe the entire process of democratic management of village, to story-telling way to describe the process of happening, and strive to further the whole management process in the "original appearance," the democratic management of village events, unlike other groups, as grand and spectacular events, vibration at home and abroad, but a very common one in rural areas, it is precisely that it's common in rural areas to better reflect the current the real situation is the so-called, general of the Department, see the truth, this principle should be that bar.This paper attempts to use Yu to Mr. Ping's "good governance" theory, from the ideological level; management and unscientific; system, the lack of the three factors to analyze the S Village management is almost paralyzed state, at the micro level can be combined Yu-ping of the legality of good governance , transparency, accountability, rule of law and responsive reading of the five areas, namely the government and civil society interaction, governance, the right to return to the club to analyze the S status of the village governance paralysis. S village governance studies have shown the scientific theory of good governanceBut, because I am dull, superficial knowledge, skill shortage, resulting in this paper have many shortcomings.