Practice-based Critique Of Modernity

Marx's alienation of thought, in a sense, is the need of the alienation concept; it is the inheritance and abandoned Hegel's theory of ontological alienation and Feuerbach's theory of ontological alienation of people on the basis of this alienation build up. As the core problem of the modern phenomenon of alienation,in Marx view, not so much that it is an eternal transcendental categories might as well say that it is a "living metaphor." Alienation is different from the object-oriented, and its complexity like a maze, which not only implies that it itself and know it can not rely on purely speculative activities in the idealized, but must be generated to capture the continuous process. In the present today, it was recognized that alienation does not mean that had been completely accurate understanding of it, not to say that there is sufficient justification to overcome it. To recognize and overcome it, the first task must is to have a "copy" of the "original" analysis, criticism and transformation, but not just by the people based on their own life experience of the nature of intuition, even though Marx understanding of the issues of modernity, is always the main principle and rational principle carried out the theoretical framework. In other words, is precisely because it is such a "real person" practical activities, as a "historical mystery" The answer, in Marx and Hegel, Feuerbach, where only the performance of the different interpretations of the path:In the former, the economy of this before derived presence (intermediaries) to each historical period has brought a set number, and thus opened up a new mode of production possibilities; while in the latter, is the absence of an intermediary to bring a set number of world history. This difference can not be shielded Marx with Hegel, Feuerbach, respectively in the social history, natural science problem domain similar and consistent. However, Marx was not a beginning of a profound alienation of holes out of the scope of this base before, but from the experience of the value of evaluation of the priority to the understanding of the historical evaluation of the priority shift. The point of this shift occurred in the culvert on the photo------to "labor" as the core of the doctrine on human nature,to "alienation of labor" as the core of the Critique of Political Economy and to "alienation of the positive abandoned" as the core of the communist Marxist theory------the three parts of the main contents of the "Manuscript 1844." Can be said that this "manuscript" is alienation, and freedom as the core practice areas of historical materialism to be the basic premise or foundation. Although Marx was rarely used "alienation of labor" concept, but he later came the use of words such as "contacts alienation", "commodity fetishism", "materialization" of the class more realistic concept. Marx's words on these changes is not just a simple change, but rather that he actively abandoned by their predecessors on the basis of a scientific affirmation. Even he can be compared to these changes and go beyond his own successor, and the critics but also a more thorough and more comprehensive. Example, began in Lukacs's "Simma", especially the rise in "a war" after the Frankfurt School, they are thought by the early Marx's study is worthy of recognition, but they only made their early thinking of the one-sided inquiry interpretation is not legitimate. Because the starting point of the Frankfurt School of Critical Theory is derived from Marx criticized Feuerbach by the humanistic, and they will be the root causes of alienation problems attributed to human civilization itself. In short, the alienation of thought in Marx ideology is a consistent in; non-dominant, nor center, but the basic; should be based on historical and dialectical approach interpretation; the same time, face up to the phenomenon of alienation, not "recognize", but not "respected", but in order to achieve a free and better "struggle."...