| Open Educational Resources Movement was carried out in 2001. This movement is a really meaningful practice of free sharing learning resources all through the world, and it has had a profound impact on the global higher education. MIT OCW Project is the pioneer of Open Educational Resources Movement, from which our Chinese Quality Open Courseware can learn the successful experience. This paper takes the courses of Chinese Quality Open Courseware and MIT OCW as the research objective, contrasts analysis on the running and Open Educational Resources of the two projects, concludes their own respective advantages and disadvantages, then finally advances some suggestion of"Learning worthy experience from MIT OCW and developing advantages of our Chinese Quality Open Courseware".In this study, literature research, educational statistics and comparative study methods are used. At the beginning of the paper the writher introduces the background of the project, the document analysis of the related research, the research design and research methods; therefore the writher elaborates the basic theories——Post-modern Perspective on Curriculum, Dialogue Theory and Instructional Design Theory used in this paper. In the third section of the paper the writer has compared the running and Open Educational Resources between Chinese Open Courseware and MIT OCW by statistical analysis. The writer focuses on the analysis of guiding resources, learning resources, developing resources, evaluation resources and interactive resources. In the forth section the writer has summed up the difference between Chinese Quality Open Courseware and MIT OCW, then arrived some comparative significance conclusions which will do good at Open Educational Resources of Chinese Quality Open Courseware. At the end of the paper, the writer has summarized the limitation of the research and promoted the following-up study of this study in future. |
PDF Full Text Request