Font Size: a A A

History And Society Course Standards (Ⅰ),(Ⅱ) Compare Research

Posted on:2011-03-12Degree:MasterType:Thesis
Country:ChinaCandidate:X H ZhuFull Text:PDF
GTID:2167360302992491Subject:Disciplinary education
Abstract/Summary:PDF Full Text Request
Since 2001 the new reform, conducted by offering the course of, it became the highlights and focus of curriculum reform in the short time. As a completely new subjects, combined history, geography, sociology and pedagogy, psychology, politics, economics, anthropology, cultural, and related natural, social contents. Meanwhile, it most reflects the basic concept and curriculum reform. More and more educators, parents, students are attracted. It has achieved gratifying results. had three editions when it had just published; they were People's Education Press, Shanghai Education Publishing House and Geological Publishing House. Along with the deepening of the curriculum reform, textbooks from different area were integrating. Since 2008, Geological Publishing House's had left the market, so the textbook we can get are from last two publishers only. Because of CEE (college entrance examination) is controlling every thing, could not get more chance to develop. It is so sad.This article is precisely against above background, according to my teaching experiences in History and Social education, also consulted curriculum reform practice in Huishan DC and Xishan DC of Wuxi and Suzhou Jiangsu Province and Zhejiang Province. Two courses on history and social, a comparative study of curriculum standards from which to seek out the same, differences, and in accordance with two curriculum standards of teaching plan compiled their own characteristics, advantages. Especially for their lack of problems that may arise from a careful analysis of detailed and thoughtful, with a view to the subject of revision courses for the preparation of textbooks, to provide some academic support.This article is divided into four chapters, the first chapter is introduction, mainly point out the issues, purpose of the study, comprehensive expound, as well as the opinions of innovation. Chapter II analyses what are their Similarities, differences and main characteristics through the article structure between two curriculum standards. Chapter III combined with curriculum practical experiences, comparative study based on Specific implementation of curriculum standards. Chapter IV, put forward the views of this article according to the curriculum standards A and B. Point out some contents need to be improved, in order to keep new curriculums move smoothly.After comparison, and with the help of my practice experience, the following conclusion are listed:1) Through curriculum standard's version comparison, under the course objectives, curriculum standards A appears to be more reasonable. And if under the structures, B has higher integration.2) Through the curriculum standards of textbooks under guidance of contrast can be drawn. Section A kept the content of history education, but the structure looks like a drugstore. Section B has reflected a better integration, but the history education needs to be strengthened. It is proved that as curriculum standards A and B not very uniform in the objective. There are some significant differences in the curriculum system, even entered the core of concepts. So, it will cause a certain degree of confusion in the implementation process. Teachers feel difficult to follow the curriculum standards and teaching outline.As the contents of the system of curriculum standards, it is necessary to reflect the integration of integrated curriculum, but also conducive to the realization of the value of history education; it is necessary to reflect the "student-oriented" education guiding ideology, but also the scientific classification system for the foundation, In this way can really in the teaching process to implement the new curriculum ideas. Based on this, for history and social curriculum standards, make the following recommendations:First, as a country, a subject of the curriculum standards should be integrated into a class standard, So as to be conducive to the implementation of nationwide.Second, curriculum standards A the is concerned, the structure should strengthen its integration, there has been conducive to the smooth development of classroom teaching.Third, the curriculum standard B, the terms of the content of history education should be strengthened, for students to handle basic knowledge of history provide the conditions.Fourth, ensure systematic teaching of, it is quite important to strengthen the teachers training in Integrated Humanities.
Keywords/Search Tags:historical and social, curriculum standard, practice of curriculum reform, contractive study
PDF Full Text Request
Related items