Study On The Reform Of Collective Forest Rights System In Shandong Province

Property system is the macroeconomic system the most important and one of the core of the system.Based on forest resources are the ecological environment protection and economic development, the "dual characteristics of public goods" and economic"externalities" decided the forest resources, forest land resources, forest resources property form of trait. The collective forest property right system is scientific and reasonable forestry and related industries related to the benign development of collective forest, influenced the development of economy and society, the more about collective forest area to raise the level of people's income and the improvement of the standard of living. Since the establishment of China, China recruits collective forests of reform roughly experienced from all individuals to collectives and from the collective all gradually transition to the individually-owned a process. Shandong province of collective forest is without exception of experience in such a process. Throughout this process, we will find that each stage of the collective forest tenure reform all without exception with the contemporary social background, economic policy, political value orientation are closely related. We should see many institutional arrangements at the time of the environment greatly promoted the economic and social development, but the inevitable defects of designing system is the existence of a large number of. Since entering new century, with China's economy to microcosmic and depth of reform, the existing direction of collective forest ownership QuanZeLi not pure, fuzzy, policy execution not being implemented usufruct of problems increasingly exposed. As China's economy in Shandong province, since one of 2008, Shandong provincial party committee and government decided in 28 county (city, area) collective forest right system reform pilot since the job, in line with"clarifying property right, perfecting the policy" the basic principles of the collective forest right reform and has made remarkable achievement. Nonetheless, the particularity and complexity of the forest right system reform of determines the forest right system is a continuous improvement and development process. Therefore, this paper studies the basic system of forestry property from around the theory of collective forest right system reform, the basic connotation, the present situation, the reform performance, the main problems and cause analysis and finally to the policy Suggestions on the logical clues unfolding. Using social investigation, historical research, classification method, and the contrast with the village-level case investigation as the key point.Eventually some conclusions were obtained as follow:(1) Forestry property right has the common charaeters of property right which are exclusiveness, separability and negotiability, Meantime it has some specialties such as special binding, measurement of criticality and the uncertainty of earnings forecasts and other characteristics. In the theory of property rights on the basis of the analysis of forest resource scarcity,we found that in shandong province existing forest right system efficiency is low, the institutional environment is to promote the variation of collective forest right system reform in shandong province the important factors.(2) Shandong collective forest rights reform dominated government role and the farmer's popular support and the broad participation.According to the results of the survey, the reform of approval rating at 100%, farmers participate in collective forest right system reform initiative is also high. The outstanding achievement, forest tenure reform mainly embodied in property get a clear and imposition of forestry production enthusiasm improve, rural society more harmonious, etc.(3) Although reform of the collective forest rights system improved forestry production to the enthusiasm of farmers and promote the development of the forestry industry, but it seems that farmers' income in forestry didn't get significantly improved and the management mode of the vulgar didn't get change fundamentally.