Study On Policy Of Perfecting The Housing Guarantee System In Shenzhen

To establish an adequate housing guarantee system is the necessary suppliment to the market economy, and an important component of the state social policy and social security system. Lately, for the reasons that Shenzhen replied too much on the market allocation as well as the neglect of establishment of housing guarantee, the structure of housing guarantee became imbalanced. Under the influences of insufficient land resource, growing population and inhabitation condition, which demand immediate improvement, the housing prices surged. People with middle and low household income have lower competence to meet the skyrocketed housing prices, which makes the housing problem difficult to solve using a direct market approach. In 2006, based on the current conditions, the government of Shenzhen established a housing guarantee system for people with middle and low household income featuring economic suitable housing, public rental housing and Low-rent housing, through which, improved the housing guarantee system and enhanced constructions. The government will also provide 140,000 houses in the "eleven-fifth" period in order to solve the housing problem for families with low household incomes. Because the new housing guarantee system is just started up, the system itself possesses many drawbacks that are to be improved. In addition, complications in implementation of the system exist as well and are mainly of: construction project of the housing is too big and located at remote areas; coverage of the project is too small; operating system is not perfect; financial support is not at place etc.By combining theory with practice, the author commences on study of the housing condition of people with middle and low household incomes in Shenzhen. In the study, he identifies the existing problems and conflicts in the current housing guarantee system, and tabulates proposals for improving the housing guarantee system in Shenzhen based on the successful experience of other countries and Hongkong: 1. to make the most of land resource and current housing to improve the housing chain structure; 2. to increase the ratio of public rental housing, and to establish the interactive mode of monetary allowance and practicality rental in tandem with a reverse descending rental; 3. to improve the supply and management system; 4. to establish implementation system of policy of identical objectives; 5. taking consideration of American mortgage subprime crunch, to improve the housing financial system; 6. to standardize the rental housing market and to introduce appropriate consumption concept. Meanwhile, for the housing problem for Shenzhen's migrant workers, to work out the countermeasures such as accelerating population optimization, establishing accumulation fund and trading lands for houses policy etc. Hoping these suggestions and countermeasures may be the references for the establishment of Shenzhen's housing guarantee system.