High School Students Personality Traits, Self-efficacy Of Emotion Regulation On The Effects Of Academic Stress Coping Strategies

The new trend focuses more on a certain kind of stress in specific areas, so this research focusing on the academic stress coping strategies is the embodiment of this trend. In addition, with the deepening of emotion regulation research in recent years, the study of emotion regulation self-efficacy as a new theme is also increasing. Studies have shown that:Emotion regulation self-efficacy play a certain prediction of coping strategies taken by the individual. Recalling the previous studies we find that: coping strategies are not only impacted by individual personality, but also the individual’s emotion regulation ability. Therefore, the aim of this study is how different personality, emotion regulation self-efficacy affect high school students’ coping strategies of academic stress. It not only helps to deepen the study of emotion regulation self-efficacy, but also helps to expand the coping strategies to a certain extent.This research explores the relations among the Personality traits, Emotion regulation self-efficacy and the Academic stress coping strategies of senior student by individual interviews, questionnaires et al. And the main contents of this research is about preparation of 《Senior students’emotion regulation self-efficacy scale》,the development of Senior students’emotion regulation self-efficacy, the development of high school students’academic stress coping strategies, and the relations of Personality traits, Emotion regulation self-efficacy and High school students’ academic stress coping strategies. And the resolution is:1.《Senior students’emotion regulation self-efficacy scale》includes three factors: Emotional expression self-efficacy, Emotional control self-efficacy and Emotional recovery self-efficacy. The reliability and validity of questionnaire are acceptable.2. There are extremely significant gender differences in emotional recovery self-efficacy and emotional expression efficacy; Emotional control self-efficacy exists significant family background differences; Emotion regulation self-efficacy does not exist a significant grade differences.3. Passive coping strategies exists the significant gender differences and family sources differences; there is a significant grade difference in active coping strategies.4. Extraversion, conscientiousness and emotion regulation self-efficacy have a positive role to active coping strategies; The five dimensions of personality have indirect effects to active coping strategies through emotion regulation self-efficacy; Except for the extraversion, the other four dimensions have direct role to maintenance strategies, but neuroticism had negative role to maintenance strategies. The five dimensions of personality have direct effects to passive coping strategies, among them agreeableness and conscientiousness had negative role to passive coping strategies.5. Personality traits influences active coping strategies through emotion regulation self-efficacy, and emotion regulation self-efficacy plays part of the intermediary role.