The Government Decision-making Democratization And Scientific Research

Government decision-making is both highly integrated and complex public behavior, pursuit democratizes and scientification of decision-making is the two basic value orientation of protecting decision-making effectiveness. In the modern government decision-making, democratization emphasized social justice, the expression of will of the citizens and the degree of integration of the interests of the citizens is the fundamental scale to measure the extent of decision-making democratization and determine decision-making effectiveness. Science is to use the logic to determine whether accord with the objective law of the development of things, what the pursuit of scientific decision-making is the guarantee probability of success of decision-making, as a measure of the standard of decision-making effectiveness. In essence, the democratization of government decision-making and scientific is complement each other, the dialectical unification. However, in certain decision-making environment, democratization and scientific of decision-making is not always positively related to state, the two conflict phenomenon is also evident. Follow the democratization of decision-making is not necessarily consistent with the logic of science, decision-making carried out in accordance with the laws of science may deviate from the values of democracy needs. In government decision-making practice the conflicts between democratization and scientific performance in those areas? What is the cause of the conflict? How to find out the best balance point between them to avoid the generation of the conflict? Based on the thinking of these issues, first define the democratization of government decision-making and scientific connotations, and the relationship between them are expounded. In practice, the realization of democratize decision-making on the fairness and justice requires citizens to participate in, decision-making scientific accord with the needs of logical and specialized gave birth to the development of the expert advisory system. Therefore, the decision-making conflict phenomenon is then demonstrated by the Chinese decision-making practice of citizen participation mechanisms as well as expert advice mechanism. In practice, Democratization and scientific can not be separated, so arising me from a theoretical point of view to distinguish them explore ideas, to seek the underlying causes of conflict. Through the cross-scientific comb, in this paper believe that distinction between democratic and scientific decision-making, politics and administration dichotomy, instrumental rationality and value rationality is essentially the same. Applying theory to found the performance and causes of practical issues, then logical explanation about them, expand academic thinking, which is also the focus of this study. Through the study of the theoretical level, this article was eventually settled in the decision-making theory, in the "Garbage Can Decision Model" framework, to avoid the problems of democratization and scientific conflicts in government decision-making ideas, proposes the solution which is perfect the institutional aspects of construction.