Withdrawal Street Cooperative Mode Analysis On Problems, Causes And Perfection In China

The deepening reform and social transformation of the economic operation systemhad presents a challenge to the urban grassroots of social governance. The existingstreet ranking system as a form of urban grass-roots social management system, it’smainly to administration, the fragmentation of urban management style has been unableto meet the requirements of the new situation, so they need as soon as possible todevelop and improve the functionality of the grassroots community. Community isbacked by the new management, protection, service mode transition. Since the last tenyears, many regions of the country are efforts to made in this regard, which produce alot of other areas of learning, the more successful reform. These reforms are two notablefeatures: First, are very fit, with local economic and social as well as the level ofurbanization in the original Street home tinkering with the system management mode,and does not do the management of urban grass-roots a revolutionary change."TheTongling mode" caused concern in Tongling, Anhui Province in2011, has evermanagement model features-revoked district offices.All the same with Tongling mode "approach reform areas are collectively referredto as the" dismantling Street Cooperative reform model. As a groundbreaking newgrass-roots social management mode, the last two years has been widespread concern inthe community. Affected, some areas are preparing to launch similar reforms, whilesome areas are holding a wait-and-see attitude or negative. Meanwhile, due to variousreasons, the outside of the withdrawal Street Cooperative reform model is notcomprehensive, many people only know to the fact that the revocation of the street, butbehind this reform practice external and internal benefits shortcomings and the future donot understand the far-reaching impact on social governance. The basic writingframework ideas of this article is:The first chapter, as the introduction, withdrawal Street Cooperative reform andexpand the background knowledge, research value, both literature and the researchmethods and innovations and other issues. Economic development to promote the citycontinues to move forward, the legacy of the planned economy period urbanmanagement style has been unable to meet the needs of social development, and expandthe social background of this is the "dismantling Street Cooperative reform. Theresearch method is the main document retrieval method, field research method, comparative analysis. The innovation lies in the first systematic analysis of the"dismantling Street Cooperative mode, and a comparative analysis of them.Chapter II, first with the related concepts of "dismantling Street Cooperativeinterpretation, as well as analysis of the reform needs as well as the feasibility ofwithdrawal Street Cooperative. The need for reform is mainly based on the currentangle of the grass-roots social management proposed the same with all the needs of thecommunity management reform, but core concept for the thesis of "dismantling StreetCooperative do focused reading. Its feasibility from the revocation of the point of viewof the street offices to expand, discusses a current revocation street have conditions.The third chapter focuses on the current withdrawal Street Cooperative mode, aswell as different experiences and practices around the point with the same pointcompared classification analysis of the various modes, and the use of the function modeanalysis method. As can be seen, the "strong community" around the withdrawal Streethave in common is far greater than the differences. Although our name all over the placenames, but also the need for analysis.The fourth chapter is based on the model of the "dismantling Street Cooperative incommon, the effectiveness of the management of this reform practices social problemsin the reform, and the reason why these problems exist because the analysis. Throughthe analysis of different angles, will give a more in-depth understanding of ourwithdrawal Street Cooperative "mode. That the main reason of the problem isinstitutional and environmental barriers.Chapter V, on the basis of the analysis in more than a third, fourth chapter, focuseson withdrawal Street Cooperative "mode after the reform measures, as well as the maindirection. To emphasize here that the perfect follow-up to the reform of the "dismantlingStreet Cooperative Management to start, not only from within the community, and tofundamentally solve the problem, but also need to adjust ideology of social governancefrom the top down.Finally, the thesis of "dismantling Street Cooperative made a summary statement,also its future development prospects.