Failure Of Public Crisis Management Mechanism And Resolve The Path Derivative Under The Risk Society

In the form of Risk Society, the frequent public crises break the normal order of theGovernment’s public administration. If the public want to take effective management ofthe frequent public crisis, it must establish “sporadic crisis” and “processual crisis"dichotomy of thinking. Under the guidance of the half of the crisis logic of thinking, thegovernment’s public crisis administration can often hit the mark and in good manners.Compare the “processual crisis “to” sporadic crisis ", the former can connect the trendof crisis development and the characteristics of the system. Crisis should not beregarded as occasional catastrophic event, and it also focuses more on research as thesystem itself caused by the crisis, while not by causes outside the system. Based on thisthinking, the governance of "the process of crisis" must be implementing the publiccrisis governance to the innovation of the government system, the market system andsocial system innovation. There exists huge complexity in the innovation of governmentsystem, the market system and social system, it’s difficult to overnight. In front oflagging behind in the institutional change, it is necessary to construct the correspondingbasic mechanisms of the characteristics of the “sporadic crises", which includes: earlywarning mechanisms, cooperation mechanism and communication mechanism.This article elaborates the basic definition of risk society, crisis management andpublic crisis. Based on the half of the crisis, it describes and analyzes our presentsituation in the public crisis management, dissects the government’s main problems inpublic crisis management. And discuss the reason why the problems exist, and introducethe crisis management made by US, Japan and borrow some ideas from these valuablesamples and be enlightened to manage the public crisis more effectively.