Economic Research Of Rural Construction Land Reclamation

Three dimensional rural issues including problems about agriculture, rural areas and peasantry have been casing great concern by the party and state, which are closely related to the interest of peasants, for peasants play a dominant role in Chinese population. Land acting as the main income source is the carrier of peasants’main assets, peasants receive property income from land development rights and land use rights to get rich supernumerary income. In addition, a reasonable allocation of land will affects the pattern of economic change and development, related to the stability of the country. In every major reforms, has the shadow of the countryside, and the land rerorment is the important content of the rura.Therefore rural construction land reclamation related to peasants and land reform has become increasingly important in China. This project reflecting the worth of rural land will help improve peasants’property income and provide land resource for the growing tension in construction. Whether there is operability in rural construction land reclamation depends on the quantity of economy benefit and the realization of optimizing the distribution of resources.Firstly, this paper illustrates the background and significance of rural construction land reclamation and gives review of overseas and domestic research. Then the author illustrate economic theories which are closely related to rural construction land reclamation. Economic factors and graphs are used to analysis rural construction land reclamation.Under the premise of a detailed analysis of economic models, take the rural land construction reclamation in Wushan, Chongqing for example, the author put forward the corresponding countermeasures and suggestions based on analyzing problems of reclamation and resource allocation situation of this place.What’s more, discussing from the following core economic factors to find out whether the rural construction land reclamation could achieve the optimal allocation of resources, which including parcel reclamation costs; profit and scale benefits; external impact caused by reclamation; effect analysis between targets of national construction plan and land indicators created by rural construction land reclamation; land indicators’pricing mechanism; welfare effect and profit distribution caused by strength gambling after reclamation, etc.After analysis of rural construction land reclamation from economic perspective the author draws three conclusions as follows:First, rural construction land reclamation costs too much and the scale of agricultural land created after reclamation presents small spotty distributions lacking relevance and can not achieve economies of scale. Most of the arable land formed after the reclamation is idle and underutilized. However, arable land formed by reclamation has increased grain output and played a role to protect the environment, showing positive external-economic effects. Second, in Chongqing model characterized by rural construction land reclamation land trading indicators can be applied for developing construction land in downtown area and countryside directly. Research shows that land trading indicators help break the monopoly of national planning indicators which always cause failure situation, but we need to study further on proportion of substitution effect between land trading indicators and national planning indicators. Third, local government gets direct benefits contributing to the high revenue and peasants get some compensation to increase their own property income from reclamation, meanwhile, it helps peasant-worker entry into cities and promote urbanization. However, peasants’benefit is always lost, for the compensation is low and in arrears with period length. What’s more, most of land indicators are sold to downtown that is much more than land indicators for private use, for local government play a dominant role in strength gambling after reclamation compared with peasants and organizations at the grass-roots level, that may hinder local long-term development without achieve Pastor Optimal. If intentions or choices of any party can not be satisfied, extra cost will come out and the extent of the damage is greater than the benefits of reclamation itself.