Inner Mongolia Normal University Institute Of Physical Education Of College Students Career Decision-making Self-efficacy Research

This research to our college students as the research background, through the issuance of career decision-making self-efficacy scale short form of Inner Mongolia Normal University College of physical education of college students career decision-making self-efficacy have an understanding of basic situation, has strong pertinence, through Inner Mongolia Normal University, Institute of physical education of College Students Employment situation analysis of self-efficacy, O Ichi, the big two, big three, big four, 402 graduate students in the different gender, ethnic, grade, specialty, training direction, students and parents occupation of the college students in career employment occupation level of self-efficacy level of study and debate in 5 dimensions, analysis and discuss relevant issues based on the results of for us, that the autonomous region sports professional college students on the employment of the corresponding conclusion, and put forward improving and respond to the autonomous region in our hospital professional sports college students employment advice, in order to further improve our college students career decision-making self-efficacy level, also provides the reference value and reference to improve the college students’ employment rate is the idea of running in our hospital.The paper adopted amendment 2003 dragon Yanmei "College Students’ Career Decision-making Self-efficacy Scale(short form)", carries on the questionnaire survey. For random distribution of the Inner Mongolia Normal University Sports Institute 460 college students with the questionnaire, 402 valid questionnaires, carried on the analysis to the gender, nationality, grade, professional, students, parents, occupation and other factors, a comprehensive investigation and study of college students of Inner Mongolia Normal University Sports Institute occupation self-efficacy level. And in the school teachers and students with the help of the scene, unified fill and questionnaire. The questionnaire data review of qualified, the application of SPSS16.0 software for data processing and analysis.The college students’ career self-efficacy in gender differences in factors, P < 0.05, indicating the existence of significant differences, boys and career decision-making self-efficacy were significantly higher than those of girls. On the nationality factor, P < 0.01, explain the careers are Mongolian College Students and Han students self-efficacy have significant difference, and the Mongolian College students performance level is higher than Han students. On the grade factor, P < 0.05, that our college students have significant differences in the grade factor, and self-efficacy level: a > > three > high graduate two, big four, big employment efficiency is highest, the big four students minimum. In the professional factors, P < 0.05, that students of different professional career self-efficacy has significant difference, and the effectiveness of physical education specialty is the highest, the lowest social sports specialty. In the source factors, P value is greater than 0.05, no significant difference. In the parents’ occupational factors, P < 0.01, that college students with different parental occupation career self-efficacy have significant difference, and parents’ occupation is the Employment Authority or institution staff college students self-efficacy extremely significantly higher than those whose parental occupation is farming herdsman, ordinary worker or self-employed industrialists and college students.Conclusion: Inner Mongolia Normal University College of physical education of college students career decision-making self-efficacy boys higher than girls; Mongolian College Students extremely significantly higher than Han students; a > > three > graduate two > four, and the difference was significant; for students majoring in physical education career self-efficacy is highest; parents’ occupation authority or business unit staff college students’ career self-efficacy is highest, and the extremely remarkable difference. But in the source factors, college students career decision-making self-efficacy had no significant difference.