A Comparative Study Of The Teaching Of Xinjiang Edition And The National General Edition Of Chinese Teaching Materials For Junior Middle Schools

The Chinese teaching material of the junior middle school is the main carrier of the content of junior middle school language education,and it is an important material basis for the function of language education.The teaching of Xinjiang's special edition and the national edition of junior middle school Chinese textbooks are different from each other because of the differences between the author's concept of writing and the regional knowledge of the subject of the teaching.They are similar in the same way and have strong comparability.From this perspective,the paper identifies research methods and research ideas based on the research of two sets of textbooks,This is the introduction;The first chapter mainly compares and analyzes the arrangement characteristics of the overall structure of two sets of junior middle school Chinese textbooks;Two sets of junior middle school Chinese textbooks can be taught according to their aptitudes and their own characteristics.The national general edition is more focused on the practice of students,and the Xinjiang edition is based on the environment of students.As a result of the actual environment of bilingual education and the actual situation of minority learners of Chinese,the Xinjiang edition is more focused on students' acceptance ability and acceptance level.The second chapter mainly discusses the content arrangement system of two sets of junior middle school Chinese textbooks.Through the comparison of several major sections such as the individual selection system,the assistant reading system,the homework system,and the knowledge filler,it is found that the teaching capacity of the national general edition is larger,and the Xinjiang edition is smaller;the national general edition teach people to practice a large volume of workbooks with a high degree of difficulty,and pay more attention to the ability of students to think about problems;The third chapter,through the comparison of writing and oral communication and comprehensive learning modules,finds that the National universal version of the practice,practical,has a strong operability;And the special edition of human education in Xinjiang has a distinct regional character,which is closer to the life of minority students,and is helpful for students to master language learning skills.Finally,it is believed that the differences and similarities between the two sets of textbooks differ in their characteristics,fully embodying the multiple appeals of the “one-level and multiple-benchmark” guiding ideology across different academic areas,and the different personality characteristics of the two sets of textbooks.Improvement also can be made in learning from each other and absorbing each other's strengths.