Research On The Land Value Increment Revwnue Shareing Level Under The Policy Of Land Usufruct Returning

With the acceleration of urbanization and industrialization process,a large number of rural land have been expropriated,thereby creating a special and large groups-landless farmers.Due to the prevalence of the land around the range is too large and the common light weight collection resettlement phenomenon,which caused a lot of landless farmers become "no land to farm,no work to do,no social protection" three non-farmers,which caused a lot of disputes,and even against malignant cases.Landless farmers whose land compensation and resettlement issues have become a big event which related to China's economic development and social stability.After the national level in the proposed "a substantial increase in the proportion of collective farmers allocated land value-added income " and the report at 18th Party Congress also pointed out "give farmers equal participation in the modernization process,to share the fruits of modernization".Hangzhou is earlier areas for land requisition system reform in our country,land expropriation compensation also has its own characteristics,which in the early 1990s began the trial of land usufruct returning has practiced for some time,but how about the effective?In this process,are the farmers reasonable participated in land value-added income distribution?How about the fairness of the land value-added income distribution?Few scholars have studied the questions above.Therefore,the research for land value-added benefits sharing problem under the policy of land usufruct returning has important practical significance in the current environment.First of all,based on the rent theory,this paper analyzed the formation mechanism of the land value-added income,according to its forming mechanism and the theory of land development rights,western theory of productivity factors,the author constructed a land value-added income distribution mechanism,and then on the basis of the inclusive growth theory and universal dividend theory,built a theoretical framework for the land value increment revenue sharing,clarified the connotation and denotation of revenue sharing,revenue sharing subject,the main principles of revenue sharing with various stakeholders to participate in revenue sharing theoretical basis,etc.On this basis,the author put forward that the revenue sharing in four dimensions including fair rights,equal opportunities,fair rules and fair results.Its goal is to ensure a fair and equitable rules enable disadvantaged farmers can have equal rights and opportunities to share urbanization increase social welfare.Secondly,applying the analytical framework to the case of Sancha community,analysis the status quo of land value-added income distribution under the policy of land usufruct returning.This study shows that,retained land value-added income is left in the village collective internal,shared by the collective economic organizations and farmers,although the municipal government is not directly involved in the distribution of land value-added income,but involved in redistribution by land tax(fee),so that the masses can share the urbanization of social welfare.Finally,based on the perspective of farmers,the author construct a index system of revenue sharing under the policy of land usufruct returning,then from revenue sharing rights,revenue sharing opportunities,revenue sharing rules and revenue sharing results four dimensions evaluate land value-added revenue sharing level by fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method.The results show that the fuzzy evaluation value of farmers' land revenue sharing is 0.6030,within upper-middle level,the fuzzy values of fair rights,equal opportunities,fair rules and fair results are 0.4993,0.7153,0.6077 and 0.6877,respectively,this means that farmers' right to share the land revenue is relatively unequal.The fair right and fair rules of land revenue sharing have greater weight:0.6904 and 0.4980,respectively,which indicates that fair rights and fair rules are important for farmers to share the land revenue.we can conclude that under the policy of land usufruct returning the farmers' right of land revenue sharing is protected to some extent;market-oriented land acquisition compensation is improved;the ability of farmers to maintain long-term livelihood improved;farmers' livelihood security and the environment are improved.The farmers' right to obtain information,to express,the right for public supervision and the regulation of collective asset management system are not complete.The regulation of retained land asset management system and supervision system also need to be further improved.