Analysis Of The Errors Of Formal Verbs "Going" And The Design Of Teaching Chinese As A Foreign Language

The use of the formal verb �conducting� is more complicated and is a difficult point for foreign students to learn.Especially the students in Japan and South Korea have more errors.Taking the corpus of "BCC Corpus" and "HSK Dynamic Composition Corpus" as an example,this paper analyzes the Japanese and Korean students' acquisitions by using the comparative analysis method and the bias analysis method on the basis of clarifying the ontology usage of " conducting ".According to the requirements of the textbooks,the targeted teaching design was made under the guidance of the teaching principles such as practical principles and communicative principles.This article is divided into five parts.The first part is the introduction.This part mainly explains the reasons for choosing the title,analyzes the research status of the formal verb �going�,clarifies the scope of the research,and explains the research method and source of the corpus.The second part distinguishes the formal verb "to carry out" from the general verb,and mainly studies the situation of the " conducting " object.In the third part,based on the search results of the biased corpus in the "HSK Dynamic Composition Corpus",the authors of the Korean and Japanese countries with higher bias rates are more detailed in the acquisition of the word " conducting ".Analysis and comparison,and summarized the causes of bias.The fourth part analyzes the appearance of the word " conducting " in the textbook.On the basis of summarizing the requirements of the grammatical point of the formal verb " conducting " in the textbook,the teaching goal is determined,and the principle of practice,systemic principle,Under the guidance of the teaching principles such as the communication principle,detailed teaching design is made,and finally the teaching effect of the teaching design is evaluated.The fifth part is the conclusion,which summarizes the research content of this paper and explains the shortcomings of the research.