Acquisition Bias Study, Based On The Comparison Of The Korean Students Double Object Construction

Double-object structure is one of basic structures in natural languages. The paper tries to reveal the difference of and the reasons for double-object structures of Korean and Chinese languages through the bidirectional contrast and checks the difficulties and order of acquisition of studying double-object structure for Korean students. The paper includes 5 parts:Chapter One is Introduction. It mainly introduces the putting forward and study meaning of problems and generalizes the train of thoughts and methods of study.Chapter Two is Study summarization of double-object structures of Korean and Chinese languages. It introduces and evaluates the present status of double-object structures of Korean and Chinese languages. The lingual types of Korean and Chinese are different, so the name of object, classification standard, the range of double-object structure and study train of thoughts are also different. On the basis of clearing up the above differences, it puts forward the classification standard of object and defines the range of double-object structures of Korean and Chinese languages. This part is the precondition for contrast and study.In Chapter Three, we discuss the Corresponding relation of double-object structures of Korean and Chinese languages. On the basis of detailedly depicting the difference between Korean and Chinese language on semanteme and syntax, it considers the corresponding relation and condition. From the corresponding angle of Korean and Chinese languages, the double-object structure of Korean language is in homoIogous with over 10 sentence patterns of Chinese language besides double-object structure, and from the corresponding angle of Chinese and Korean languages, the double-object structure of Chinese language is in homologous with triplex-object sentences, making sentences, single-object sentences and compound sentences besides double-object structure. The paper makes bidirectional contrast and investigation for Korean-Chinese and Chinese-Korean, so the cognition for difference of double-object structures of Korean and Chinese languages is all-around, and at the same time it lays the basis for confirming potential difficulties and biased error analysis of acquisition.Chapter Four is Investigation and analysis of biased error of acquisition. On the basis of contrasting study, it systematically analyzes the biased error on the course of studying double-object structure for Korean primary students. We have found that mother-tongue influence (61.9％) and objective language influence (58.5％) are main reasons for resulting in biased error, but the disturbance decreases year by year. The biased errors resulting from mother tongue include miss- substitute of sentence types, miss-adding words and pretermission etc, and the biased errors resulting from objective language include ratiocination error, incompleteness of application of formula, redundancy of component and simpleness of formula etc. Through biased error of acquisition to clear up the grade of difficulty and order of acquisition at last.Chapter Five is Conclusion. To summarize the whole paper and point out the content of further study.