| American political scientist Huntington once mentioned in his book "The Clash of Civilizations and the Remaking of World Order" : "The competition in the future world will be the competition between culture and culture." Nowadays,the government is no longer only focusing on economic development,but is increasingly aware of the importance of upgrading cultural soft power.As an important part of cultural soft power,public cultural services are self-evident.Since the 18 th National Congress of Chinese Communist Party,the Party Central Committee,which takes Mr.Xi Jinping as the core,pays high attention to the construction and perfection of public cultural service.Public Cultural Service Guarantee Law of the People's Republic of China marks a new stage in the supply of public cultural services.Public cultural service of Poverty Alleviation of Cultural Precision develops towards standard and equalization direction.In 2017,Promoting the Equalization Planning of Fundamental Public Service of the 13 th Five-year Plan clearly pointed out to construct the modernized public cultural service system and better satisfy the mass' s spiritual and cultural demands.The 13 th Five-year Plan is the key period for our country to succeed in building a moderately well-off society in an all-round way.The public cultural service is the shortcoming and direction,which need overcoming by devoting greater effort.By means of retrospecting the relevant research at home and abroad,it has found that there have been researches,which pay attention to the discussion on the theory of public cultural service,analysis on the supply-demand mode,the practice experience and reference at home and abroad.However,these researches lack the deep comparison and analysis on the supply mode at home and abroad.As the world's number one power,the United States has a world-leading supply of public cultural services.Although the political systems and specific national conditions of China and the United States are different,however,there are still many lessons to be learned from the useful experience and successful measures in the provision of public cultural services in the United States.Therefore,in order to conduct the deeper study on the supply mode of public cultural service at home and abroad,this paper focuses on the comparison of the supply of public cultural services between China and the United States,a topic that scholars have not yet focused on.It establishes the analysis framework of "subject-medium-object".The framework is composed of three subject dimensions including government,market and society,four medium dimensions including policy,capital,talent and facilities,and two object dimensions including urban area and rural area.On this basis,combined with the theories of public goods and new public services,this paper conducts a detailed overview and in-depth comparative analysis of the supply of public cultural services in China and the United States from the perspective of the subject,the medium and the object by using the methods of literature analysis and comparative analysis.It extracts and summarizes the existing problems in the supply of public cultural services in China from these three aspects,such as the government's overall responsibility,low participation of the rest of the subjects,insufficient implementation of policy funds,lack of professionals,and differences in the public cultural services enjoyed between urban and rural areas.In the last part,firstly,it extracts and summarizes the existing issues and insufficiencies of the supply of public cultural service in our country.Then,it absorbs the excellent experience in construction and supply of American public cultural service from three dimensions--“subject-mediator-object” and aims at the practical issues of public cultural service in our country and gives constructive suggestions and countermeasures from the three dimensions--“subject-mediator-object”,in order to promote the perfection and development of public cultural service supply system in the domestic. |
PDF Full Text Request