Research On The Disadvantage Of "One-vote Veto" System In Grass-roots Government

First of all,the scope of the study is clear,that is,the analysis of the drawbacks of the "one-vote negative system.Under the pressure system of government management at the grassroots level,the government at the grassroots level has to quantify and refine the various assessment indicators issued at the provincial,municipal and even county levels in order to break down the task objectives one by one.Such a management approach and acontrolled evaluation system.Power is incorporated into the higher level,the party committee,and the government.It plays a role in power,establishes a target responsibility system,and uses administrative positions or economic rewards and punishments as incentives to spread pressure and temptations down and down.The way of implementation.The "one-vote negative system" conforms to this trend and pushes it to the highest peak.The disadvantages of the evaluation system of hierarchical indicators:The "one-vote negative system" overuses the incentive mechanism that exerts pressure on the system,so that the first-level government needs only to be responsible to the relevant government departments at the higher level,not to the lower people or the level.The organization is responsible.With the continuous increase in the number of veto assessment indicators,it gradually changed to serve mainly for the examination and appraisal,rather than serving the people.At the lowest level,the government must not only accept various forms of assessment at the higher levels,but also assess each grass-roots staff at the internal level,and also assess the cadres of various administrative villages and even departments at each unit level,and establish another from the top level to the bottom level.Relying on various types of inspection and assessment as important indicators of the assessment system.The inspection is generally all quantitative and fractional.The ultimate result of this accountability mechanism is to act on the objectives,so that the work of the first tier of government will only be related to the goal of a veto,but it will be contrary to the original intention of rural development.The "evaluative work" has led to a continuous decline in the willingness of the lowest level of government to serve the government.This has led to the financial constraints of the grassroots government after the tax reform,which has exacerbated the specific problem of the lack of local grassroots government capacity.First of all,the basic system of grassroots government lacks a sound compensation for interests and a reasonable regulatory mechanism.It is difficult to correct the uneven distribution of social benefits,which increases social injustice and causes members of society to participate in social life.It has also made the process of building social and political democratization at the grassroots level more slow,with insufficient transparency in law enforcement,administration by law and political activity,and has made the internal channels within the system for members of society to express and safeguard their own rights and interests and those of the general public less unimpeded.So rely on the so-called "self-relief" outside the system.Public administration,on the other hand,is driven mainly by good policies.Policy-driven governance has played a very good role in governance for a long period of time.However,there are difficulties such as unsustainable,lack of flexibility,and "people are in politics,people are in politics,and people are dead." There is no long-term mechanism construction.Second,the "one-vote veto" is not only numerous,but also the timing of its creation and the process of implementation is very random."Many departments are using greater efforts to obtain the permission of their party committees and higher party committees,and use the"one-vote veto "approach to promote this work."Thirdly,the "one-vote negative system" leads to the completion of these tasks as the final goal,and it is extremely easy to lead to extreme law enforcement and distortion of law enforcement.The second is the"view of performance" supremacy,leading to fraud and confusion.The third is to confuse the functions of some governments and affect the full and effective performance of their duties.Fourth,it violates the principle of appreciation and punishment,and is not conducive to the establishment of a scientific management system.The fifth is to reflect the consciousness of "people's rule" and disrupt the administration in accordance with the law.